• 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because then the rival company would also go out of business. The pharma industry is not about absolute cure but about continuously selling things - like all industries do. Medicine that cures you entirely and is not needed afterwards forever again is nothing the pharma industry wants.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly, that’s why we’ll never have a vaccine for something like polio, it’s too profitable to make and sell iron lungs.

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You joke, but that’s actually a really interesting story. Jonas Salk, the developer of the polio vaccine was adamantly against even patenting it and claimed that it ‘belonged to the people’. There is some potential controversy there, but we mostly just think he was a pretty great dude.

        I get the analogy you’re trying to make, but maybe want to switch to something else.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          I get the analogy you’re trying to make, but maybe want to switch to something else.

          Like any other vaccine?

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I don’t really see how that goes against it. If anything it shows that some people will totally disregard profit in favor of bettering humanity. See also: the patent for insulin.