• AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Who is president now and what has happened with those issues?

      “prove it” How about about you go look up what a null hypothesis is, brain warrior?

      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You sure you know what null hypothesis is? Its entire point is that the newcoming claim has to prove itself not the established one

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The fact that you think any of that is Biden’s fault tells me all I need to know about how serious you are about politics and facts.

        I’m just going to link you to this comment, because your “objection” is exactly the same as theirs.

        https://reddthat.com/comment/9976883

        • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          smuglord I’m sorry you just activated my “I shut down emotionally and intellectually if I hear the wrong take” card

          I’m assuming it’s your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m assuming it’s your emotional wounds that prevent you from looking into where the burden of proof lies when asserting two things are different from each other?

            Libs never think they have to back up their claims and assertions no matter how flimsy. The burden of proof is always on anyone whose opinion doesn’t match their propaganda. Then they tell us we’re in an echo chamber michael-laugh

            • Lojcs@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              If you genuinely think

              and they are not even close to the same on other issues (LGBTQ rights, unions, women’s rights, taxes for the rich, etc.).

              Is a flimsy statement then yes, you are in an echo chamber.