I thin Zig actually stands out pretty well from the pack. You sound maybe a little jealous or something?

The build system was basically a black box until 0.14.

The Zig core team is pretty chill and pretty united around strong engineering ethos. And tbf their own compiler is pretty performant and produces similar level quality code. The argument that compiler dev is hard falls fairly flat when they are succeeding in developing their own compiler.

I hope to Darwin social media ends up requiring ID. I believe it would do wonders for democratic discourse. It was only last week, a number of large US right-wing accounts were revealed to be driven from outside the US. Is it healthy for democracies that so many people pay heed to foreign actors?

If you write an op-ed for a newspaper, the newspaper need to identify you as there is an editor who is responsible for what gets written in the paper. This ensures there’s someone who can stand to account for any libellous statements.

With social media we immediately reneged on this and allowed them to wash their hands; “we are just a channel” is a pretty bleak statement to make when the discourse on social media destroys the lives of minorities, encourages suicide, undermines our democracy with AI and troll farm bots.

And we can do this is a privacy preserving way - of course the social media companies feeds the opposite narrative because they don’t want to implicated in the piles of shit they shovel on top of our democracy.

If social media was required to ensure they could tie an account to a real person, which they needn’t reveal unless forced to by a court order, we would know that we were engaging with a real opinion, not something coughed up by a Putin-run AI bot or a Chinese troll farm.

The system required isn’t that complex.

A social media

• a social media company is opening a new account.
• it sends the person opening the account to any of the multitude of ways we can already verify identity online.
• the person is identified and issued an identity token, which gets sent to the social media company.
• the social media company says “great, this person is real and we can, if required by a court order, work with the identity company to reveal who this person is is”. Right now, all the social media company has is a token.
• the account is opened.

In a system likes this, the identity company doesn’t know who the person is; that sits with the social media company.

Nor does the identity service know which account is actually posting for this real person, all they know is they verified someone as part of an account opening process.

Social media should be treated like the press - make them accountable for what gets posted and allow them to place this accountability on a real person by labelling posts “op-eds” if, and only if, they know who is doing the posting.

We are letting large, anonymous money-men ruin our democracy behind the veil of “free discourse”. It’s not free to the many people who gets harmed by it.

This goes way back. Intel has a proud tradition of writing shitty NPU Linux drivers and hoping to sneak it in. My lshw has only the Intel NPU as not having loaded a module successfully.

Hvor er du et dejligt menneske! Jeg glæder mig allerede

Where I live, well off (seen in global scale), white, westerner is the average. Would you prefer me to represent an opinion that doesn’t reflect what I observe in my surroundings?

The Nordics.

I live in Denmark at the minute.

Not at the minute no.

Or I live in a country with better cops than you?

In terms of delivering the highest proven outcomes for the broadest amount of people I’ve not seen evidence that anything beats a well regulated market. If new evidence is presented I shall gladly revise my opinion.

I’m a pleasant human but find myself often downvoted for what I consider an average social democratic view; taking the viewpoint that, in my country, cops are generally trustworthy, the market works when regulated by a well functioning democracy and it’s ok to be wealthy, but expect to be properly taxed.

I would have said exactly the same, but about PhotoPrism. Funny how perspectives differ.

You’re already spending about £1200/year (per taxpayer) on social housing.

£293,000 per meter. You could extend HS2 by 6 km. It wouldn’t even get another stop.

£25 per person. Not that much could be achieved for that, tbh. Everything sounds like a lot on a national scale.

What’s wrong with drinking out of your hands?!

Altså har du læst om, hvordan det virker? Serveren er ikke involveret ved brug af beviserne.

Det kan du så vælge at sige “det stoler jeg ikke på”. Dig om det. Men det er i hvert fald helt tydeligt for mig, at de påstår at bevare privatlivets fred.

https://digst.dk/it-loesninger/altid/teknisk-vejledning/

Dr.dk er skrevet af skolepraktikanter eller de må fyre deres redaktør. Der er dagligt stavefejl, grammatiske problemer og lignende.

I’ve donated to Gimp and used it plenty. I’m sorry but Affinity on Linux would be an insane upside for me, regardless.