• 0 Posts
  • 824 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2024

help-circle


  • The article is correct.

    Commenters here throwing shit at it (not all of them) should read up on what the word “degenerate” means and how it’s close to what they’d want it to say.

    It’s absolutely the same as with genetic diversity.

    Also the whole fucking point is that you don’t have to adopt what you tolerate, the comment about “big tenting with these fuckers” is clueless.

    It’s interesting how Americans blame bad-bad boomers for the world they left you, yet this particular kind of crap started happening when the generation of John McCain started getting too old.

    And as someone living in Russia I’d much prefer it to be a parliamentary country of a 100 sorts of conservatives and fascists (from Makashov fascist party to CPRF to national-bolsheviks to monarchists) with unregulated capitalism, than what we have. And since that was the choice in 1993 and 1996 resolved electorally in favor of “against assortment of radical mostly right shit” over “for some democracy no matter of which people”, that led to Putin, maybe someone can learn on the mistakes other people did. In this case not look too close at people who still want to preserve some checks and balances and electoral democracy.



  • The mod ego problem will exist as long as there’s moderation, unfortunately.

    It was present in the web even before it was expelled from heaven.

    But it’s not necessary to remove all moderation, just global identifiers of posts and many different “moderating projections” of the same collection of data can be enough to change the climate for most of the users. Not moderation itself really matters - the ability to dominate, to shut someone’s mouth matters. If the only way you see a post is without such at all - then maybe it’s too rude. If it’s removed on the instance level on most of instances - then maybe it’s something really nasty that shouldn’t be seen. But if in some projection it’s visible and in some not - then we’ve solved this particular problem.

    In such a hypothetical system.


  • tuning its algorithm to promote the most divisive material possible. Because that is what will increase engagement

    But at the same time in every case I described on Lemmy an experience not maximizing engagement by maximizing conflict, I was downvoted to hell’s basement. Despite two of three modern social media experience models being too aimed for that, that’d be Facebook-like and Reddit-like, excluding Twitter-like (which is unfortunately vulnerable to bots). I mean, there’s less conflict on fucking imageboards, those were at some point considered among most toxic places in the interwebs.

    (Something-something Usenet-like namespaces instead of existing communities tied to instances, something-something identities too not tied to instances and being cryptographic, something-something subjective moderation (subscribing to moderation authorities you choose, would feel similar to joining a group, one can even have in the UI a few combinations of the same namespace and a few different moderation authorities for it), something-something a bigger role of client-side moderation (ignoring in the UI those people you don’t like). Ideally what really gets removed and not propagated to anyone would be stuff like calls for mass murders, stolen credentials, gore, real rape and CP. The “posting to a namespace versus posting to an owned community” dichotomy is important. The latter causes a “capture the field” reaction from humans.)






  • Its hilarious to me that people think that the founding fathers, who ostensibly designed this entire country specifically for the benefit of the land-owning gentry, would hate maga politics.

    I think they would. Land-owning gentry culture had one visible advantage over most of modern political culture - if you make a rule, then you follow it, and if you say a word, you mean it. It was important, people would fight on duels for these things about them being put in doubt. Not that they all would really act this way, of course.

    Differences between MAGA and Democrats for this purpose are not important.

    I would bet every dollar I have that if the founding fathers snapped back to life right now that they would be no different than the maga morons or libertarians that want to run this country into the ground

    I think they would find some similarities with libertarians for the reason stated above. Some.

    But in general I think they’d disown whatever in the modern world is ascribed to them.



  • Compared to before, no, there aren’t.

    Well, that can be said about Greeks and Armenians in Crimea as well as Crimean Tatars. That’s because after Stalin’s forced movement to Kazakhstan (which is barbaric act, of course) or wherever, when descendants of those people were allowed to return, they were more likely to move elsewhere in the union. And after 1991 Greeks would often repatriate, well, to Greece, changing the ethnic character of the whole Russian and Ukrainian Black Sea coast, and Crimean Tatars to Turkey.

    I think you also underestimate the role of Sevastopol. Purely due to strategic importance there’d be people coming from all parts of the empire and the union, and the “melting pot culture” there was Russian.

    There has been an ongoing genocide since the tsarist times,

    That’s a weird way to say this, before Crimea becoming part of the Russian Empire the actual Crimean Khanate didn’t exist for too long. It seems you have a misconception of Crimean Tatars being some sort of the native population of Crimea. They were not. They were a nomad vassal state to the Ottoman Empire, conquerors themselves. They weren’t the majority there ethnically under that khanate either.

    That’s why people are “wary” of Russia - because it is a genocidal state since time immemorial.

    That’s gross from someone who’s likely a US-American or a European. Also “time immemorial” doesn’t quite mean what you seem to think.


  • One would think on the decline of democracy and accompanying problems you should gain faith in democracy.

    But somehow it’s always the opposite.

    The less scientific progress there is, the more people “lose faith in it”, the less peace there is, the more people are skeptical of it, the less equality there is, the less people value it.

    I think it’s not natural, rather an illustration of covert media propaganda being very powerful.


  • It’s not only that, it’s also that USA is doing the competition with China the rough way.

    China is mostly building up peaceful (of the cutthroat kind, but still) economic influence, USA is mostly not countering that with the same, but just disrupting possible logistical projects beneficial to China with wars.

    So they’d want, I think, to have USA at least keep applying force where it already does, allowing China to keep growing. They don’t want to do military solutions, their military is not that experienced and it’s not necessary when economically time is working in their favor.

    Putin is basically mocking (or imitating) the US, it’s his inferiority complex - he thinks Russia should be perceived as some superpower of the kind of the US, and the same things to be “allowed” to it, so he does what he sees as the same things that US does. The results are secondary. While the US establishment and current, eh, leadership in turn too have an inferiority complex - they think today’s US should be as “great” or at least “reliable” in perception as the US of 1960s, except they forgot the context and why even US of 1960s needed to be what it was. The results, in foreign policy, are mostly secondary too to that, I think.

    IMHO it’s because of the stagnation of the elites. The more involved wide population is into decisions, - even USSR had something reminiscing meritocracy in ministries and in industries and in the military, - the better is the quality of the whole state mechanism with its culture and elites. While the more narrow and closed it is, the more similar it is to a Hearts of Iron game.






  • Federated application for a map with markers and notes?

    It seems for me that this would be too narrow a purpose.

    Maybe a general-purpose public notification map. With some functionality allowing to separate markers by their authors and by tags. Or it can be spammed with bogus markers. By tags - well, for it to be general-purpose. By authors - because moderation can’t be left to instance admins.

    And, of course, I’m personally for separation of moderation, instance ownership, identities and hosting, but my own toy attempt showed me that the logic of checking the chain of privilege delegation is kinda PITA. That is, separating identities from instances is not that hard. And communities. What’s hard is the community owner delegating rights to other identities, and in general authorized actions. It’s a task of determining which privileges does an identity currently possess, and how does it affect its own actions on the community, and in which order should those be processed … Everything is harder than it seems. Sad.

    So federation is fine LOL.