• 0 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2025

help-circle
  • Isn’t the clarification of what they meant, also the exact same thing as what they originally said?

    No.

    They clarified what they meant by what they said, not by the context that you think they didn’t provide in the original text

    I don’t understand that sentence.

    Why did you say “If you have to ask someone else whether you should switch then you should not switch.”? Because the only reason I can find, is if you misunderstood and thought they were asking if they should switch to Linux in a general sense, rather then specifically based on their specs for gaming.

    Such a question hints at a lack of curiosity and wherewithall, engendering an expectation that it would be problematic for the asker to switch, both in general and based on hardware specs.

    I know what /s means but I’m very confused what you’re trying to say.

    I was indicating that I was being sarcastic in order to make a point.





  • not only is there the OG post as proof, but they also told you (in implication) that you misunderstood

    I did not tell OP that I disagreed with them, you misunderstood.

    /s to make a point

    OP knows what they meant by what they said - you can’t tell them they don’t know what they meant

    I haven’t commented on what they meant, only on what they said.

    I get it that you’re having a hard time understanding how what they said, means what they said it does, but you’re allowed to accept that you misunderstood.

    LOL











  • You’ll never guess what the ‘T’ in LGBT stands for…

    You’ll never guess what the ‘L’ in LGBT stands for…

    She is actively seeking to drive a wedge between LGBT communities and the police

    I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion given the article. You seem to be jumping to conclusions.

    as well as trying to divide people in regards to LGBT issues

    Again, I don’t see how you can come to that conclusion about her goals. The fact that she simply has a different opinion to others doesn’t imply a goal of dividing people. Dividing people may be a conseqeunce of her actions but that doesn’t imply it’s her goal.

    She will happily cut off her nose to spite her face, if it means harming trans people.

    Again, this is jumping to conclusions.

    And being part of a community doesn’t make you immune from being against the community. … there’s homophobic/transphobic/biphobic people in the LGBT community

    True but that doesn’t mean any particular person who is critical of one section of the community is necessarily against the whole community, that doesn’t follow.

    there were Jews in Germany who hated Jews and happily supported Nazis

    Firstly wow that took no time at all https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin’s_law

    Secondly, this is a false equivalence. Every example you’ve given is of a member of a community being against the whole community but in the case we’re discussing, a member of a community is critical of only part of the community, not the whole community. And critically, it’s a part of the community that they’re not a member of.