- 15 Posts
- 19 Comments
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
PC Gaming@lemmy.ca•Valve bows to Kremlin: LGBTQ+ solitaire game [Flick Solitaire] pulled from russian Steam [cited a 2006 federal law prohibiting the "promotion of non-traditional sexualities"]English
145·4 days agoThese comments are shit. Who said that you should comply with Russia’s laws???
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK about SearXNG - an open metasearch engine
7·5 days agoI like it because there are some very obscure sites in its index I couldn’t find in any other search engine, which can be returned from fairly simple queries.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK about SearXNG - an open metasearch engine
5·5 days agoThe other search engines still work but I tend to get irrelevant nonsense as results
Yahoo and Duckduckgo return pretty good results for me.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Games@sh.itjust.works•Gabe Newell caps off Steam Machine week by taking delivery of a new $500 million superyacht with a submarine garage, on-board hospital and 15 gaming PCsEnglish
32·17 days agoThe billionaire is the one who told them to do it.
So what? They would have eventually done it without him.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
16·19 days agoThis still doesn’t mean Google has some kind of ownership for it. Nobody stops you from forking it and taking it into a different direction.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
6·19 days agoai shit is all easy to disable
Users don’t have to disable it. Just give them a browser where they’re not enabled by default!
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
29·19 days agoGoogle tech
Chromium is open-source. It doesn’t belong to Google or anyone else.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
41·19 days agoThere aren’t better alternatives
They are literally mentioned in the article:
Those unhappy have another option: use an AI‑free Firefox fork such as LibreWolf, Waterfox, or Zen Browser.
- https://manualdousuario.net/en/mozilla-firefox-window-ai/.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
28·19 days agoYes. Chromium isn’t bad in itself though.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
131·19 days agoWhat do you mean by “we shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good”? Why should I use a browser which is actively anti-user when there are better alternatives out there?
8 GB of RAM was a basic minimum standard to do anything on a computer 10 years ago
That’s called “privilege”.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•Italic and bold markup should output italic and bold text, not emphasized and strongly emphasized textEnglish
0·1 month agobold, italics, etc. are used to indicate context
How can you guarantee they are? There are no technical restrictions or instructions on how much or where you can use emphasis and strong emphasis in your message. Until that’s not the case, “italic” and “bold” should be treated as purely presentational markup.
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" width="100%">
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
Lemmy@lemmy.ml•Italic and bold markup should output italic and bold text, not emphasized and strongly emphasized textEnglish
0·1 month agoused for accessibility purposes
Screen readers do not and should not care about presentation; abusing semantic markup to indicate through emphasis that something is italic or bold is anti-accessibility.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator










Bigotry against the bigoted isn’t bigotry.