Maybe I’m just drunk and missing something, but… Why is this in Funny?

Is it just that whoever wrote the text at the top is a little bit cringe? Is it that the art itself is, I dunno, derivative? Is it something to do with the actual stop sign? I’m lost…

Unnecessary nobody

Unnecessary nobody

Mealime.

Meal planning app. Has a database of hundreds of easy to make, healthy, tasty recipes. Tell it how many people you want to cook for, for how many days. It builds a whole meal plan, adjusts the quantities of all the recipies, builds a shopping list for you, and will even forward the list to Instacart for you if you’re into that.

It also builds the meal plan based on reducing food waste, so if you have one recipe that uses half an onion, it will automatically find another recipe that uses the other half. You can also define ingredients you don’t like/allergic to and it will avoid recipes that use those.

MASSIVELY increased the amount of at-home cooking I do by getting rid of all the boring/annoying parts. Kinda like Blue Apron, but you just go buy your own groceries. Best $2 a month I spend.

Ook

Greetings fellow Portlandian! I was at WLF last night too! Such a great atmosphere!

Years ago I got to visit the perfume lab at the Fashion Institute of Technology in NYC, where students learn about making perfumes.

It was kinda like this! They had rows and rows of little bottles all filled with concentrated oils of different aromas. Probably the weirdest one I remember is “money”. I cracked it open, and sure enough, it smelled just like a stack of well used bills.

Was a really cool experience. Maybe see if there’s a perfumer anywhere near you who would let you come explore their lab?

As an out and proud gay man… I’m kinda with the city council on this one.

I’m curious what flags that “represent the international character” means, but otherwise it seems like they’re only allowing official government flags on government property and banning everything else. That seems fair.

Representation is nice, but I don’t need to see a pride flag hanging from every corner to feel seen. The only thing the government owes me is my civil rights, liberties, and basic human dignity. Slapping rainbows all over everything is just kinda performative lip-service, and is frankly cringy half the time.

Also, fuck the misleading clickbaity title of this article.

The live action Chip N’ Dale Rescue Rangers remake on Disney+ is SOOOOOO much better than it has any right to be.

It should be terrible, unwatchable, irredeemable garbage.

It is probably one of the best “kids” movies I’ve seen in the last decade.

Ugh… Monogamists…

I agree with everything you said. You CAN draw a logical line from what Trump’s lawyers are saying to the conclusion that “Trump lawyers tell Supreme Court that Constitution doesn’t apply to the president.” That statement and conclusion is not, technically, factually, incorrect.

However, I do feel like using that statement as a headline strips away all the context and nuance, leaving nothing behind but rage-inductive click-bait. That headline gives no meaningful information, and if someone takes it as literal truth, without reading the rest of the story, they will be massively uninformed about what’s actually going on. It’s a disservice to the reader.

I’m just as frustrated and horrified by what’s going on as everyone else, but this headline is SUCH a stretch. Like, 98% click bait, 2% kinda-sorta truth. PLEASE read the actual article and not just the headline.

This story is about a specific legal mechanism (universal injunction) that has been used by federal judges in dozens of cases throughout decades. It’s a controversial mechanism that has been used on both sides of the political spectrum. Sometimes for better, sometimes for worse. It’s currently being used to pause some of Trump’s worst bullshit.

Trump’s lawyers are arguing that this very specific mechanism shouldn’t be permitted in current cases regarding immigration. They’ve also argued that this particular mechanism is unconstitutional. His lawyers are wrong, and shitty, but they are in no way arguing that “the constitution doesn’t apply to the president.”