I hope this is your highest voted comment on Lemmy.
Let me help you with the cis dude perspective. I’ll explain it to you in a way you can understand. I’m a guy, I know. . . . /s
The ring man.
Drop the link brother.
This is such a great set.
Any situation with more than 2 people. I love the idea of groups or swinging, but IRL I am a very awkward human - couldn’t do it even if presented with the opportunity. And I have no interest in anyone besides my partner.
I’ll leave that one to fantasy-land.
The enshitification of the promenade.
Task failed successfully.
I respect the meme changed her hair style appropriately to canon.
Is middle Little Caprice? An all time fav of mine.
Noted liar lies. News at 11.
“We’re going to have some fun too.” GET IT K-DOG.
Boy did they fix him in Prodigy.
Do you want a UTI? Because this is how you get a UTI.
Oh no. I don’t know how to explain it. It’s just my existence. It just streams out of my brain, through my fingers instantaneously. There is no first half second half.
Although I am a known terrible writer.
Worth noting, this is normal from my perspective. I think all of you are the weird ones.
For an Internet discussion, I really appreciate your open and honest exchange. Good day fellow Internet person.
Ok next question, because I think I interpreted the term differently than you did.
There are two types of term limits right? Quantity of terms, and length of terms.
Status quo: Q - one term, L - for life.
Wouldn’t limiting the length but not the quantity maintain the incentive for impartiality? So there is no concept of a second term?
I’m not trolling btw, I’m looking for an honest airing of the Q.
ELI5, How does no term limits allow for impartiality?
Jackson and Lincoln