Usually people study a subject because they’re at least interested in it. What you’re saying is like asking a surgeon to work in IT, for instance, just because they’re paying more. That’s not a fair game, we’re humans with our skills, perks, defects… you can’t pretend everyone moves like a pawn just for money.

Boeing, like many other companies is playing the game of “maximise the short term profit” and as usual the easiest way is to cut labour costs. That’s why they’re in this position (poorly built planes, killed HUNDREDS of people etc.)

Thanks to everyone that has replied, all fair points. When you use (read, view, listen to…) copyrighted material you’re subject to the licensing rules, no matter if it’s free (as in beer) or not.

This means that quoting more than what’s considered fair use is a violation of the license, for instance. In practice a human would not be able to quote exactly a 1000 words document just on the first read but “AI” can, thus infringing one of the licensing clauses.

Some licensing on copyrighted material is also explicitly forbidding to use the full content by automated systems (once they were web crawlers for search engines)

Basically all these possibilities or actual licensing infringements would require a negotiation between the involved parties.

This process is akin to how humans learn by reading widely and absorbing styles and techniques, rather than memorizing and reproducing exact passages.

Many people quote this part saying that this is not the case and this is the main reason why the argument is not valid.

Let’s take a step back and not put in discussion how current “AI” learns vs how human learn.

The key point for me here is that humans DO PAY (or at least are expected to…) to use and learn from copyrighted material. So if we’re equating “AI” method of learning with humans’, both should be subject to the the same rules and regulations. Meaning that “AI” should pay for using copyrighted material.

I wish it was usable enough… loved BeOS and I really hope to have Haiku as my daily driver one day

That’s because linuxserver focuses on creating docker images for existing projects.

Usually if you check a product on linuxserver.io is because you know already the product and you want to find a good quality docker (docker compose) image.

All the github and docker pages from linuxserver have the same structure and after the generic intro they present the project.

Personally I love what they’re doing but I understand your confusion, it was the same for me when I first knew of the project.

It’s explained in the FAQ: https://www.beeper.com/faq#how-can-i-self-host-beeper I’ve not used the app so I don’t know how practical/easy it is but they’re at least offering the option, which is laudable.

For what I understood the decryption/encryption process happens on the bridge. The bridge is the selfhosted component so the transformation would happen in your server and they would have no visibility over the unencrypted message.

Could it be because you didn’t close the >> after dict<<string ?

HaikuOS, simply FANTASTIC! Out of curiosity are you using it as a daily driver? I’ve tried early beta (2010 or so) and it was super fast but not enough to use it every day…

Open your wallet /s

Fortunately this is not the case, Mortadella has to have “big” chunks of fat in it unlike what you see in the picture.

Said that, I’ve seen seen some abominations that made me wonder if it was even legal to label it as human food (I’m exaggerating :D)

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortadella

The Expendables 4 is out? You made my day, really need to watch it! I enjoyed all of the three in the series, light humor, action, all my old heroes… couldn’t ask for more.

Give me some time to watch it before calling the cops to pick me up :D

Did you know that you can use Joplin on a standard webdav server? Basically it just takes up the space of the data itself. I have it on a Caddy server and works like q charm synching between Windows and Android client

Thanks, makes much more sense. Too bad that some great titles lost just because they were not so popular. To be fairer Steam should add some rules like: of you didn’t play the game, you cannot vote it…

I had a similar reaction on these titles…honestly I felt that the results were rigged. Is it just me?

Thanks a lot, great suggestion! I’ll play around with it and let you know :)

Thanks but that would not fit my case as I’d have to install locally all the toolchain. As much as possible I’d like to have everything on a remote server.

Thanks for the reply, actually I wasn’t aware of that functionality in Github, that’s fantastic! If only I could have something similar selfhosted… :)

Thanks, that was an option I had on table, just wanted to check if there was a “simpler” solution

Fantastic suggestion and thanks for the post, very clear! I played with NixOS some time ago but I totally missed this capability. Fits quite well my use case, thanks! And I found this extension that could make things easier: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=arrterian.nix-env-selector