As I understand it it was still only a police response and the army was not called in. Why couldn’t the municipalities just call in the police of their own accord?

You believe that the possibility of economic harm to businesses is in itself justification for the invocation to Emergency act?

Isn’t this also missing the point? Is what a judge thought before the case was heard relevant? Surely a court case involves presenting facts from both sides and arguing the case and not prejudging the case as if they were there before the start and before the case was heard. I think technically the judge would have to recuse himself.

What I am unclear about, as a non Canadian, is what the ruling means. For instance is there anything about the ruling, as it stands, to prevent or impede the government, in any way, from invoking the emergency act in future as long as they have a majority in parliament? If the ruling has no teeth why does the government care about it. Why even appeal it?

So you are fluent in Russian language?

I know that the election process is gamed to some degree even if it’s not Trump style.

Trying to get straight answers out of candidates or parties is near impossible and I’ve tried. They simply ignore my emails and if in person, at the market stalls, they do the same.

You no longer have public health care?