Only the physical design. Also there’s no such requirement, not that strict anyways. Much smaller companies have worked with both, e.g. Tenstorrent. AMD can easily manage that.
Only the physical design. Also there’s no such requirement, not that strict anyways. Much smaller companies have worked with both, e.g. Tenstorrent. AMD can easily manage that.
Isn’t it literally MagSafe?
Why is it MagSafe, and not Touchstone?
Because every design flaw from Apple is a Feature-not-a-Bug™, costs a fortune to fix and they don’t fix it for free without immense publicity pressure.
Even then, it’s a goodwill, they did nothing wrong.
Essentially, Qualcomm couldn’t get anyone to use their proprietary protocol that probably requires Qualcomm hardware and definitely requires royalty payment to Qualcomm.
I wonder why no OEM would want to be locked to Qualcomm and pay Qualcomm more.
getting privacy features,
What privacy features? And did you know many skins offer fake information? For example OPPO and Vivo. Provides fake IMEI and tracking information to the app instead of blocking access.
It poisons the well enough that tracking data in China is basically useless.
Try dipping it in ultrasonic cleaners. Not too long, 10-15 seconds at time.