wait. you just made up a fake guy to be mad about. everyone is saying maybe don’t put this one politician on a pedestal and your reaction is “oh so you hate him”
maybe explain how this is good faith dialogue or go shout at some other wall somewhere else.
The guy who went on Charlie kirks podcast? whose ex married don Jr?
I’m sure he doesn’t personally have a problem with cis white gays, but there’s a lot of evidence he’s willing to say whatever he thinks will land him the presidency.
No more or less than your average palantir or meta employee
Americans are more greasy than cute but we can all appreciate work to change the narrative.
keep going, I’m almost there
Salman Rushdie 😒
Those pasty shoulders are going to need medical attention in about five minutes
DON’T TALK! WATCH!
DON’T TALK! WATCH!
YOU CAME HERE, WATCH IT!
DON’T LIKE IT? WALK OUT!!
I have to admit I was assuming dumpsters contained maybe more dead animals than was realistic
Had to? no … but I am certain that RFK Jr has done it for fun
there have been zero comments about this bill saying that this was the ideal best strategy. why bring it up?
e: I think the negative response is because it feels like you are advocating for less billionaire taxes, rather than good faith discussion about how to make sure they are taxed appropriately.
This is immediately and indelibly part of my worldview. Blocking and hiding any contrary comments
No war but class war, brother
The element you’re missing, is that fascists have no need to honestly represent their ideas on the debate stage.
When you platform a fascist, you’re just giving them a megaphone to lie about how they are actually progressive and left-wing but an immigrant took their job, so now we should round all immigrants up and deport them to Sudan.
five. hundred. cigarettes.
goals