Because Kobe Bryant died. Guess I should have included that in my explanation.
Because Kobe Bryant died. Guess I should have included that in my explanation.
Taylor Swift gives out her hat to a person in the front row during “22” of every Eras concert. One of the shows recorded for the Eras Movie the hat was given to Kobe Bryant’s daughter, which is what’s shown. Edit: Kobe Bryant died suddenly in a helicopter crash in January 2020.
If politicians actually have a shit about protecting US citizens data, they’d push for legislation to protect US citizens data from all data harvesting apps. Instead “china bad, ban”.
What’s your point in linking to that opinion piece?
I just upload it to YouTube as “unlisted” and share the link
There was never any evidence of this. The best explanation I heard is that Magnus’ company was merging with chess.com right before a tournament, and with that the information of cheating bans were made available to him. He found out that Hans had been banned for cheating a couple years prior on chess.com. Speculation is that this put Magnus on tilt during his match with Hans, and losing just confirmed Magnus’ suspicion that Hans is a cheater IRL as well as online.
Don’t get my hopes up
What? She made Lover mid-relationship. That’s not a bad thing or something to win/lose. Its just how she rolls.
Because no defense lawyer would ever advise that
If your client is actually innocent, there’s a place for getting on the stand with righteous indignance. But… That was clearly not the case here.
I wish we could pin it to some objective measure and stop dealing with this set of decisions. Same with other forms of support.
I bet she’s worked 600x harder than Jeff Bezos
I’m a swiftie posting in a swiftie community. 💅
Great info. Unfortunately for me, this requires more energy than I’ve got laying around.
Here comes the thunderdome again
Honestly I don’t see a difference in 4k/1080p with streamed media. Physical media on the other hand is night and day.
I think they were afraid of discovery revealing even more malicious information than what’s being assumed.
I’m here for it!
Its definitely a matter of taste. You’re absolutely allowed to not like a cake because it’s too sweet. You’re allowed to be sickened by it. Where the discourse gets frustrating is when people find it impossible that others don’t find it sickening, and try to convince others that it is unequivocally sickening.
If you have such a visceral reaction… why are you asking people to explain it? Are you listening to the answers and reflecting, or taking the opportunity to speak past their response?
Yeah, wine obsessed feels more evermore
I think there will be a market for “corporate compliant and secure!!” LLMs. “Pay us gobs of money so you don’t get ‘hacked’ by dumb LLM users”