amio

I agree… to a certain degree. I don’t think every sort of gatekeeping makes you an asshole, but this… does apply, unfortunately.

The specific reason for my take here is that people dismiss things they don’t understand all the damn time, especially if it’s an “invisible” affliction. Implicitly and sometimes without even realizing it has happened.

It is impossible for people to understand major depression, “significant” ADHD, etc if they haven’t experienced it themselves, and most people just haven’t, and therefore can’t. While that is true, the brain is only too eager to pattern match, which is where you get into “major depression is like when I felt slightly sad once and could just focus on something else” and “ADHD is just like when I didn’t particularly feel like doing that one thing, but then it took almost no additional effort to do it anyway and it made me feel better afterwards”. If you try to map those experiences onto people with, bluntly speaking, any kind of actual problem at all, you will think the problem is much simpler than it realistically is to anyone actually affected - and not even realize it is happening.

Some people can get closer to actual understanding through (near) connections who both suffer obviously enough and are talkative enough about it - but this is rare and it fucking shows.

In short, it is intellectual laziness proper, in a form that you very definitely can do something about. As opposed to just saying “you and you with your definitive respective neurodevelopmental differences from the average, you should be able to tackle any consequence arising from it with straight up aplomb”. Which, in case it wasn’t obvious, I’m not a huge fan of.

Yes, the term is hanging in there (and could do so indefinitely) even though Google stopped giving decent results several years ago.

No, that makes sense. It’s just missing quotation marks.

I feel like an asshole for saying this

And do you know why that is?

Your claims don’t need to be refuted. They manage that fine on their own by being patent nonsense.

I likely have some combination of autism / ADHD myself

Should probably stop using that as an excuse, bro. Just try a bit harder on this empathy and knowing-what-you’re-talking-about thing. Wikipedia is your friend

A lot of it was lightweight enough that archival sites etc might not have specifically ruled them out, aside from specific efforts to preserve Flash material. There are also modded versions of Flash Player and emulators that can still play SWFs, and FLV remains supported fairly commonly.

Source? Not asking for science.

Yeah, and none of that is new in any kind of sense, but suddenly now it’s an issue with this specific word.

“Honestly one of the dirtiest things-”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHAHAH. HAAAAAAAAAA HAAAA HAAAA *gasp* HAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHA.

Sorry.

I just feel it’s weird how many people suddenly have an issue with the word “weird” now that someone used it against a Republican once. Oh, the humanity, for such a word to be (very accurately) applied, oh, the horror.

Yes, terrible to “attack” the poor guy like that. He’s just concerned for the level of the discourse, poor thing.

https://kbin.run/m/politics@lemmy.world/t/602314/Kyle-Rittenhouse-criticized-Donald-Trump-So-conservatives-said-he-s-transgender (ctrl-f the name)

This you? Specifically: this you, arguing in a way that instantly, grossly obviously outs you as a troll. Not only the intensely weird way you’re defending a murderer, but the intensely weird ways you’re going about it. I’d elaborate, but don’t feel like educating trolls.

So there’s the answer to your " genuine " question. Of course, you remain free to ignore this terrible unprovoked attack from my side and pretend I’m quivering with rage, if that makes you feel better. :)

kbin.run although the missing instance blocking is really starting to get on my tits.

deleted by creator

I’ve been hearing reports that “the market is way down” (due to Kamala/Democrats/god knows what else)

And how would you estimate the likelihood of any part of it being… uh, true? What are they basing it on, does it seem to check out with reality?

I mean, surely these allegations wouldn’t, in a truly shocking twist, have come from their (notoriously pathologically dishonest) political enemies, right?

Cue “Green Demon Challenge”

The subtitle means it isn’t canon. “Koma gag battle” means like a cartoon contest in this case.

Hm. That’s weird.

Not a slur. Not even close.

What it is is an omnipresent, versatile, variable, nuanced word, that someone apparently started using “politically” like fifteen fucking minutes ago - I don’t see that as a compelling reason to hustle to change my lexicon, and wouldn’t advise anyone else to do it either. It is literally playing into their dogshit tactics: “validating their view” is, respectfully, not a good argument if we’re talking about the American right which I’m going out on a limb and assuming we are. This is because their “view” (like many of their imitators) is “I will bitch about everything I can possibly pretend to take offense at, or else make something up”. Therefore, allowing them to dictate your vocabulary (extremely and intentionally hypocritically, between the incessant bitching about “political correctness”) seems like a losing or at least pointlessly annoying proposition. You are playing chess with a pigeon, it will shit on the board and strut around like it’s won.

If they didn’t want to be called “weird”:

1. Maybe they shouldn’t have been weird

2. Maybe they shouldn’t be whinging about it from the #1 spot on the podium of irrelevant namecalling and shit-flinging kindergarten/zoo tactics.

3. Tough shit lol

4. GOTO 3