You mean all those profits aren’t going to trickle down?

Then they should be lumped in the with ones that did vote for him. Is someone is apathetic enough to not even engage in the process, they don’t get to avoid the insults, as far as I’m concerned.

It reads like a question simultaneously sent through google translate and a thesaurus. I’ve tried several times, but I just cannot work out what I’m being asked.

Methinks the JD doth protest too much.

Or trusted.

Love it! And always appreciate an opportunity to share this detailed guide:

He’ll answer in two weeks.

I’m guessing that’s in reference to your reply to someone else about messages going out asking for donations after the supreme court decision? That may be in poor taste, I’ll grant you, bug doesn’t change the fact that it still wasn’t the democrats that made the decision in the first place.

If Person A punches Person B, and Person C could have stopped it, I would still blame Person A for throwing the punch.

I mean, I am utterly befuddled at how you could reach that conclusion.

It’s a bold take to blame the side that failed to prevent something, rather than the side that actually did the thing.

But not from X. Checkmate haters.

They’ll release it in two weeks.

A very good point, I’m just bitter about the cost of a 99!

Did not know that, very interesting! Wonder if there’s something similar for the UK.

The Code is more what you’d call “guidelines” than actual rules.

I do hope this isn’t a road to the term ‘pint’ just becoming a generic name rather than actually holding meaning. I remember when a 99 referred to the price!

OK… It is in the very first sentence of the article.

No it isn’t. The first sentence is “New York police have defended their actions after a bystander was shot in the head as two officers tackled a fare-evader armed with a knife in a busy subway station”. Nowhere there does it specify that the police were the ones that did the shooting.

Edit: The article seems to have been updated since my initial comment, the opening sentence now reads “Protesters in New York have demanded accountability after police fired at a suspected fare-evader in a busy subway station, hitting a bystander in the head”. However, the headline is also different, and is about protests, so I wonder if the whole article has been replaced.

You can get shot by the NYPD any day, but how many opportunities are you going to get for a free knife.

What an oddly flattering photo of Trump.