Where are you seeing performance issues? As your issue might be less with your CPU and more with storage or some other bottleneck.

Depends on your gaming box.

If your gaming box has fewer cores (say, an older i5 or current i3 CPU), you might notice Nextcloud running. Pihole is so light I doubt you’d notice even if your gaming CPU was a potato.

If your gaming box is more than four cores, I doubt you’d ever notice.

Out of curiosity, do you have everything in /tank? As in tens of thousands of directories or files directly in the root versus a tree of directories?

Might I recommend starting without doing the router bits?

The reasoning is simple - if the rest of your homelab goes out, you just lose access to whatever you were playing with. If your homelab-router goes out, you lose Internet access.

A NAS, on the other hand, is an excellent first homelab project!

You don’t have to run the emulators on your NAS. In fact, you probably shouldn’t since your NAS is unlikely to be plugged in to any video output.

Pretty much anything can just point at your NAS’s shares for access to any and all emulation. Heck, I think an Amazon Fire Stick can even do it.

If your buddies want to bring over Shield Pros to play, all you should need to do is let them on to your WiFi and have read access to your roms or ISOs directory.

So… I guess I’m not quite sure where you’re going with the question?

Just keep in mind that you’re going to need to make sure your hypervisor supports BIG.little architectures if you go with option one or two. I believe the latest version of Proxmox does, but just make sure you’re on the right Linux kernel first.

1. RAID-Z2 or RAID-6 is probably more than sufficient, as that has two parity drives for a pool of drives. RAID-1 does make more sense if you are only using two drives though.
2. It can work, but generally USB enclosures aren’t the greatest approach for what you’re trying to do. Do you have space for your two internal drives instead?
3. I mean, it is exactly that - a filesystem. It is a rather advanced one, and it does have some features that would be useful for you, like snapshots so you can go back after messing up a file. It also tends to run fast at the expense of it being a bit hard to expand and eating more RAM than you’d expect.
4. Generally, anything but an SMR drive.
5. I’m not quite sure what you mean?
6. PCPartPicker, sort by price-per-TB?
7. There are only a limited number of RAID configurations, if that’s what you mean?
8. It depends; are you disciplined enough to actually run backups, or are you a normal person that needs automatic cloud backups? :P But seriously, do you think you’ll run manual backups often enough?
9. ZFS and btrfs both do a decent job at handling such things.

I mean, a NAS is literally Network Attached Storage. Your old laptop has storage and, presumably, is on the network; that’s a NAS.

The reason why people have standalone NAS boxes is because a laptop usually can’t hold all that much in the way of storage. My NAS has 42 TB of addressable storage; that’s not really viable on a laptop. Add in any form of redundancy (my 42 TB of storage comes from five hard drives), caching (32 GB of RAM helping with a read cache), or other services and people quickly outgrow a laptop or even a miniPC.

I’m generally of the camp that only have storage and storage-based services on my NAS, so the CPU of my NAS is super weak compared to my actual home server. There is a good chance the CPU in your laptop might be stronger than my NAS’s CPU even. Other people combine their NAS with their home server, needing a stronger CPU as a result.

As for why a prebuilt? Some people don’t want to delve into that and just want Storage That Works ™. I don’t dive into networking content all that much, hence a prebuilt router instead of something using opnSense or something. I’m happy playing around in the guts of a storage box (it really isn’t all that complicated), so I roll my own.

Are you actually in PCIe lane contention?

You have a dGPU using an x16 slot, an HBA using an x8 slot, and a SAS expander using an… x4 slot, I think? That last one I’m not sure about, please correct me if/when I’m wrong. While yes, that adds up to needing 28 lanes of PCIe on paper… most dGPUs don’t actually need an x16 slot. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if you could get away with an x4 slot - meaning you really just need an x8, x4, and x4 - which adds up to sixteen lanes.

Now, I don’t know what you’re using that dGPU for, it is entirely possible you have some type of need for that many lanes… but you might be able to just shuffle them around and make things work better than they are now.

Far be it for me to stop a homelabber from throwing more money at the hobby of course, but maybe you don’t have to?