Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.

  • 440 Posts
  • 3.26K Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月15日

help-circle










  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzDonors
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 天前

    Ah I see. I’m not sure that’s technically possible, but if it were, that’d be great.

    I think better would be simply outlawing any communication between a donor and recipient, if the donor wishes to officially remain anonymous. Not they “have no way” to prove their identity, but they’re not allowed to prove it—or even imply it.


  • Zagorath@aussie.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzDonors
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    I don’t know what you mean by

    double-blind to the donor AND recipient

    But to me that phrase kinda implies that the donor doesn’t know who they donated to. Which…no. It should be blind to the recipient. Entirely blind. But people donating can still choose where to donate to.




  • Zagorath@aussie.zoneto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneTank Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    3 天前

    It’s not cropped, it’s a different photo. 5 separate photographers are known to have captured the event, who each took multiple photos. Many of whom were on different floors of the same hotel. Jeff Widener of the Associated Press took one of the more famous telephoto shots from the 6th floor of the Beijing Hotel, while this wider one was probably taken by Stuart Franklin of Time, higher up in the same hotel.




  • I read a story the other day about a guy whose lesbian friend operated an OnlyFans account. At one point she went to him and asked for help creating a video that one of her fans had requested. Not PIV sex, but sexually-charged activities (the story didn’t specify exactly). She paid him a portion of the money she got from it.

    Following this, the guy started following her OnlyFans anonymously, and began paying for more of the same content on a regular basis. Pretending he was one of her random online fans, paying so she would do sexual acts with him, and getting back some of the money he paid when she paid him.

    The majority of comments under the post seemed to think this was absolutely fine. But if you ask me, that was sexual assault. Because it was sexual acts done under a dishonest premise.


  • Transcription:

    Anônimo disse

    I actually did bite my dm with explicit consent. because I was trying to argue that a ranger/barbarian’s bite would be d6+Strength Modifier. and not d4+Strength Modifier. and he was like lmao human bites aren’t even that strong. and I said bet. and he said well bite me then as strong as an 18 attack roll would be (the prison guard had 14AC btw) and we had to stop the game because he had to go get stitches.

    also he didn’t wanna say he let himself get bit to win an argument that he lost so badly he’s in the emergency room, so he was like “a rat did it” and the nurse turns her head 12 degrees to the left and sees my bloody mouth. and goes “yeah okay that happens”

    and we did get the barbarian bite attack to be d6+Strength Modifier. I’m also now engaged to this guy and this campaign I get to be the dm!

    probablybadrpgideas Absolute rollercoaster, but congrats on the engagement - Paper