I’m shocked that anyone thinks this rule is about fairness in the first place. This rule is in place to protect owners- that’s it. If it was about “fairness” it wouldn’t be a loss cap, it would be a spending cap. The rule is an agreement among the cartel of owners that they’re never going to get into a financial race to the bottom in order to win the league.
Oh man, definitely number 2.
I’m shocked that anyone thinks this rule is about fairness in the first place. This rule is in place to protect owners- that’s it. If it was about “fairness” it wouldn’t be a loss cap, it would be a spending cap. The rule is an agreement among the cartel of owners that they’re never going to get into a financial race to the bottom in order to win the league.