Depends if you’re a Germanic incel or an Irish one.

If your goal is accessibility, you’re taking quite a long walk to get there.

In trans-inclusive spaces we use “woman,” in reference to the gender, as opposed to female, which usually designates sex.

Like a nature documentary, for example: “The female meetkat seeks out her pack,” as opposed to “The woman meetkat hollers at the girls.”

I can agree everyone should get to enjoy equal access to the web and still believe censoring user names is nice. There’s gotta be a balance between accessibility and preventing harassment.

Have you asked OP to link the comment in the post text?

How about a transcript for the image? That way user names could stay blocked.

Probably 'cause they commented to the same thread.

I disagree.

Never said anything about morality. I said would be nice.

So you don’t have data.

As you can see, women have trouble keeping men out, too.

I’d like to see your data.

Thank you! I have mental health problems so even negative attention is fulfilling.

AND I don’t think rehashing someone’s minor mistake for public theater is cool without the user names removed. People were shitting all over him when he already got clapped back, so I said something.

Absolutely! I encourage support spaces for everyone. I’m calling out the irony that this user is up and down this thread arguing against the women’s community and spouting female priviledge ideology, while now complaining that men can’t have the same thing… or else people will complain and spout male priviledge ideology.

There are many ways that sexism hurts men, which is why I’m down with support spaces and actively discourage all men bullshit when I see it.

Claiming those spaces doomed from the start, because of people behaving exactly like Tittyfrog here, is bad faith as hell.

I believe the eth is the soft ‘th’ like thought, where your tongue is behind/on your top teeth, while the thorn is the harder, tongue in front of your teeth sound in the.

Removed by mod

Oh good. I don’t follow this com, another comment tipped me off.

While I do enjoy a little bit of chaos and schadenfreude, it would be nice to block out user names. Call out the mistake, not the person.

Most people here are lovely, but it only takes one match to start a fire. Might as well address some bullshit in these comments since I’m gonna get trolled by incels anyway…

side note: I’m not a mod there.

• The women’s com is trans and non-binary inclusive. Anyone who feels at home there (and is respectful) is welcome.

• It’s not all bitching about men. Looking at the last twenty posts, one was about men and two were related to men. We talk about pads and health and essays and positivity memes and do fun activities on fridays.

• I support men making their own support groups. Although the internet itself often feels like a menfolk support group(to me,) I’m sure there are plenty of things an easy to find, curated space, could offer men who want to be just a little more vulnerable, knowing they would be supported by the mods if any toxic women came in to devalue their opinions and experience.

Oh god. Had to look for that since I don’t follow the com.

The guy fucked up but it’s a dick move not to block his user name. And mine. I guess I can look forward to a week of angry incel trolls.

Anoþer shæke-up in þhe fuðark community!

Just a heads up this story is over two months old. That said, here are some key points:

• The accused, Kasper Lincoln, is officially titled “Barbie Jeep Driver.”
• Kasper Lincoln just wanted to get a slurpee and his license was suspended.
• He was driving on the sidewalk until it ended.
• He was arrested by an unmarked police car. A Ghost Car, if you will.
• The lawyer has, among her certificates, a “Bad Ass Award” and a “DUI Defense” certificate. They’re next to each other.
• Kasper Lincoln did his hand signals and everything.

I’m way oversimplifying here:

Judges can only make decisions within their scope, the extent of the law, and on the evidence before them. They do have some jurisdiction within their court, like holding someone in contempt, but they can’t convict when no charges have been laid.

Cops can be sued civilly, but since we’re talking criminal law the charges would be determined by a crown. The problem is the whole criminal court process usually starts with cops arresting someone and presenting their reports, so good luck finding cops who will rat on a buddy. Or, a crown who wants to risk losing the cooperation of the police. I know one who moved to practice in another province after they went after an extremely corrupt detachment.

The CCLA has done a bunch of work taking up cases to hold cops accountable, but the whole judicial foundation isn’t just cracked, it’s crumbling. Ask any half decent crown, judge, or lawyer in private what they think of the police if you want to get stuck down a depressing rabbit hole.

Jam. Make some Jam. Everyone needs jam. Put vodka in the jam so it’s fancy.

User call-outs are (usually) bullshit, especially for someone who brings me as much genuine delight as the Thorn Guy.

I agree your post didn’t fit the community, I get why you did it though, and think it’s pretty awesome of you to defend someone else on principle. The mods just aren’t trying.

You could start one on another instance. There aren’t any rules against it.