Something tasting nice isn’t a good reason to subsidize a destructive industry.

There’s less harmful and still great tasting alternatives.

Trees are nice, we should have more trees everywhere.
Planting trees isn’t gonna solve the climate crisis and shouldn’t be sold as a solution like it sometimes is.

Probably not no, flying really does emit a shit ton

Having to register to be able to vote is so silly to begin with.

“The 50-year-old is at least the fifth environmental campaigner to be jailed on tax evasion charges in the last two years as Vietnam’s authoritarian government steps up a crackdown on activists.”

Seems legit…

We can probably assume that microplastics are everywhere at this point

Go vegan

deleted by creator

Sustainable eating is cheaper and healthier - Oxford study

No car is better and cheaper than electric.

Fund public transport!

Go vegan

If only this was an actual possibility…

Because it’s yummy

A bad thing giving you pleasure(tasting good in this case) doesn’t make it okay to do the bad thing.

and there is such a thing as sustainable farming for animal products. We did it right up until the turn of the Industrial Revolution and things were fine.

It requires a shit ton of plants to feed animals for animal products, way more than using plants directly, nothing sustainable about that when we can just use plants directly instead.
What do you think sustainable farming of animal products looks like?

but all you’re doing is annoying someone who is potentially on your side with unnecessary dietary restrictions for the sake of “it’s overall better, do your part”. I am doing my part.

You are not on my side if you support needlessly killing animals for profit/taste.
You’re not doing your part if you willfully support super damaging industries that have readily available alternatives because “tastes good”.

Also can you explain why you only have this reaction to my comment and not the parent comment which is the same but about conservatism? Is that just as bad? annoying people who might be on our side.

As I mentioned if you want to fire shots, take aim at the corporations that’s are the ones truly causing all this harm.

What does taking aim at corporations look like if not refusing to give them our money while advocating for regulation?

The individual has almost not impact in comparison to one corporation.

The reason these corporations do bad things is to earn money, they get that money from individuals.
If people who think these corporations are doing bad things stop supporting it then suddenly the corporations have less money.

Why not be on the right side of history?
Why do you want to be forced into not doing bad things instead of just changing on your own?

If I want to go home and celebrate all that hard work with a perfectly seared steak, that’s not going to kill the environment.

It is tho?..

Animal products are incredibly harmful to the climate and are inherently wasteful.

Those corporations get their money from people like you.

Yes regulation would be the best to stop them but you know that’s not gonna happen any time soon, especially when everyone refuses to change their own habits, politicians aren’t gonna force through regulations that get people angry because they want their steaks.

Why do you want to continue to participate in something bad until it’s legally not allowed anymore?
Why not do what you can (stop consuming animal products) while also advocating for regulation and political change?

What does holding evil corporations accountable look like if not refusing to give them your money?

If you aren’t vegan, you aren’t fighting climate change.