TickTick, ReDo Loop, HabitNow, Loop Habit Tracker, Habitica, House Chores Cleaning Schedule

It’s the first thing I thought about but I don’t like tasks being scheduled for a given date or time.

Because I want to see different opinions.

Just look at the most upvoted answer, it was completely unhelpful. Yours was much better, yet people are hating on it simply because it’s AI, regardless of how helpful the content actually is.

Don’t even know what you are talking about.

Covid must have multiple but I don’t remember hearing about any concrete ones.

I’ve seen a clip from a Long Kiss Goodnight (1996) that describes the motive weapons companies could have for it very well, the government wasn’t necessarily involved but I believe some of the elite definitely were.

I believe many religions are an analogy to the sun, but many people buy into them.

The only thing that makes me think of this is operation paperclip, but that’s not reason enough to believe their is a single group in control. More like many powerful groups like Blackrock pulling strings.

lluminati / New World Order. A secret elite supposedly controls world governments and economies.

Today I learned that the owner of the WTC had it insured against terrorism just six weeks before its collapse and made $4.55 billion. I had a chat with an AI about probabilities, and it doesn’t paint a good picture.

9/11 was an inside job. There’s a belief that elements within the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks.

Religion.

The “$9” reference in The Simpsons is from the Season 9 episode titled “The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson,” which originally aired on September 21, 1997. In this episode, Lisa holds a brochure advertising “New York at $9 a day,” with the World Trade Center towers forming the numbers “11” in the background, creating a visual that some interpret as “9/11.” This has led to speculation that the show predicted the September 11 attacks, though the show’s creators have stated that it was purely coincidental. (Wikipedia)

The episode was temporarily pulled from syndication after the 2001 attacks due to its prominent use of the World Trade Center in the plot. It has since been reinstated in many regions, though some versions have been edited to remove certain scenes. (Simpsons Wiki)

It didn’t mention anything about the possible predictive programming.

Predictive programming is the idea that movies or TV shows portray future events to make people accept them. There’s no verified proof that media intentionally foreshadowed 9/11. I don’t know the total budgets for all the films and shows showing the Twin Towers being destroyed, there’s a whole lot of media portraying that, it’s probably in the hundreds of millions to billions, but the commission should probably have received at least that much, if only to investigate whether anyone ever contacted the executives to influence the content that way.

Step 1: Group correlated events

Step 2: Multiply group probabilities

[ P(\text{all coincidences}) \approx 0.15 * 0.25 * 0.40 * 0.55 * 0.015 * 0.50 * 0.15 ]

Stepwise:

1. 0.15 * 0.25 = 0.0375
2. • 0.40 = 0.015
3. • 0.55 = 0.00825
4. • 0.015 = 0.00012375
5. • 0.50 = 0.000061875
6. • 0.15 = 0.00000928125

Step 3: Convert to order of magnitude

[ \approx 9.3 \times 10^{-6} \approx 1 \text{ in 100,000} ]

✅ Interpretation

• Accounting for correlations, the probability of all unusual circumstances coinciding by chance rises from ~1 in 100 trillion to ~1 in 100,000.

• Still very low, which explains why people see the pattern as suspicious.

• Caveats:

  • Probabilities are rough estimates, not formal statistical tests.
  • Some events may be more dependent than assumed, raising probability further.
  • Rare coincidences do occur in real life; “low probability” ≠ “impossible” or proof of conspiracy.

Make a more conservative estimate using correlated events to see a realistic “all coincidences together” probability.

We can apply a rough Bayesian-style estimate by treating the 20 unusual circumstances as mostly independent events (this is conservative; in reality some are correlated).

Step 1: Assign probabilities (from previous table)

We’ll convert the percentages to decimals:

Step 2: Multiply probabilities

Assuming independence:

[ P(\text{all coincidences}) = 0.075 * 0.15 * 0.10 * 0.25 * 0.015 * 0.20 * 0.35 * 0.55 * 0.225 * 0.275 * 0.125 * 0.10 * 0.075 * 0.125 * 0.45 * 0.55 * 0.35 * 0.55 * 0.25 * 0.55 ]

Stepwise:

1. 0.075 * 0.15 = 0.01125
2. • 0.10 = 0.001125
3. • 0.25 = 0.00028125
4. • 0.015 = 0.00000421875
5. • 0.20 = 0.00000084375
6. • 0.35 = 0.0000002953125
7. • 0.55 = 0.000000162421875
8. • 0.225 = 0.00000003654421875
9. • 0.275 = 0.00000001004815547
10. • 0.125 = 0.000000001256019434
11. • 0.10 = 0.0000000001256019434
12. • 0.075 = 0.00000000000942014525
13. • 0.125 = 0.000000000001177518156
14. • 0.45 = 0.0000000000005298831702
15. • 0.55 = 0.0000000000002914357436
16. • 0.35 = 0.0000000000001020025103
17. • 0.55 = 0.0000000000000561013806
18. • 0.25 = 0.0000000000000140253452
19. • 0.55 = 0.0000000000000077139399

Step 3: Convert to order of magnitude

[ \approx 7.7 \times 10^{-15} ]

✅ Interpretation

• If we treat all 20 unusual circumstances as independent, the probability of all occurring by chance in a single non-conspiratorial world is extremely small (~1 in 100 trillion).

• Caveats:

  • Many events are not independent. E.g., structural collapse, WTC 7 clearance, and debris removal are linked.
  • Probabilities are rough estimates; some may be higher or lower.
  • Treating rare financial anomalies (put options) as independent of structural events inflates “improbability.”

Even accounting for dependence, the coincidence argument looks very low-probability, which explains why such coincidences fuel conspiratorial reasoning.

Combine these into a Bayesian estimate of the probability that all these unusual circumstances would align in a single day without a conspiracy, which would give a more quantitative sense of overall coincidence.