

I’ve reported it too, probably it won’t have an effect but we might as well try


I’ve reported it too, probably it won’t have an effect but we might as well try
What for? If it’s plural you can use “parents” just fine, and if you’re referring to one of them, you can always use “my dad” or “mom”.
I guess it could be useful to have something equivalent to “my parent” that is gender neutral and it doesn’t sound as dry. But then again it doesn’t allow you to differentiate which one you’re talking about. I’ve seen people with gay parents use “dad” and “papa” or something along those lines, which solves that problem but isn’t gender neutral.
Language evolves to serve a purpose or solve a problem, and I guess we haven’t had this linguistic challenge before.
(Leaving aside that these are technically not pronouns, but I don’t think that’s the point of the conversation and we don’t gain much by debating grammar)


Depends on what the targets are for the C-Suite, but in 2026 one could assume yes.
I use AI transcriptions and read them. I feel if the person can’t put effort into writing, they shouldn’t expect me to put effort into listening.
I sometimes send them when I don’t have a better way of communicating (e.g. during a quick stop in the car) but I tend to apologise because I know how much of a ballache they are.


Like Gmail? Google drive? Slack?
I’m not defending AI, but I can come up with >10 products that would absolutely cripple the company I work at if the provider suddenly says “Soz, terms of service violation”.
Vendor reliance is dangerous. That doesn’t just apply to AI. If the company in OP’s message had both Claude and Gemini they’d been okay, so the problem isn’t with AI explicitly - the problem is with reliance on services that are critical for workflows, and providers being able to change their mind at a moment’s notice.
In any case, leaving aside where the problem is, the idea that 60 employees can’t use Natural Intelligence to do their jobs means there’s something really wrong with that company…


First of all, I’m going to say that I don’t think this comparison actually makes sense and I was just entertaining the question of the message I was replying to - humans are machines are way too different to reduce the comparison to merely “which is more energy efficient”.
But second, I compared to the same level - I stopped at infrastructure. I didn’t consider the costs (energy or otherwise) of building a solar panel or power plants in the same way I didn’t consider the costs of a frying pan, a hob, or farms. Because if we do that, then any point we make about this needs to be a 500 page dissertation, not a Lemmy message.
The good news is that data for how much material/energy is required for a solar panel is freely available, and also that a solar panel can be used for energy generation many more times than a cow.


Well, in pure energy usage, no; however if you take into account the energy usage of the whole chain, they’re orders of magnitude better.
After all, they can even be hooked up to a solar panel directly. For us to get 2000 kJ of energy, we need to water plants for a year, transport them, spend more than 2000 kJ of electricity cooking, and that’s not even considering raising an animal for x months or years which needs >5000 kJ a day to just exist. Our sun->movement energy efficiency rate is pretty appalling and orders of magnitude worse than a robot’s - even if the robot is just hooked onto the regular grid.


My money would be on Mandarin but… Boy it’s a hard language. The English has a few quirks but it is an EASY language compared to most, including French. IMO, this and not number of native speakers or economic power alone explains best English overtaking French and establishing itself as de facto lingua franca of the 21st century.


How can you ever depict a gay relationship in a game without “being woke”? By having the characters say “no homo” loudly and high five while they fuck? I swear right-wing asswipes find new mental gymnastics routines every day to redefine what they mean with this word.


The only thing is that the 8GB Framework 12 is a bit more expensive than the (8GB) MacBook Neo, and if you get it to 16GB it starts getting close to MacBook Air territory. But if you can sacrifice the nice build quality and nice screen plus spend some extra £, you can get Linux and a repairable laptop.
In any case: Windows is just not a value proposition anymore. Why pay extra to deal with Intel, MS and Copilot?
Of course not; in the eyes of Tories, all Muslims have brown skin, which is BAD. But Jews are white, so that’s “good”.
I cannot comprehend how Kemi Badenoch can be okay with racist policies. It’s like gay Republicans in the US, I guess… Crazy cognitive dissonance.
Surely the leopards wouldn’t eat my face…


No matter how many times they try to make it sound like the same thing, anti-zionism is very distinctly not antisemitism.


It used to be really hard to defend Apple and the pricing of their “budget” lines. But these days it seems manufacturers are trying HARD to make apple look like the sensible option.
£1099 for a 2 year old processor, 1080p, 256GB and 16GB RAM, and it doesn’t even run linux but windows? How’s that better than a £1099 Macbook Air that comes with a better screen, brand new processor, 512GB and the same 16GB of RAM?
At this point you’re paying extra for the privilege of dealing with Windows and Copilot. 🙄


At the risk of being called a corporate bootlicker, it sounds like it isn’t their own, it was their employer’s.
If it’s your own, absolutely, fair play. If it’s your employer’s… Then it feels murkier. I wouldn’t blame their IT department for being quite cross if/when time comes to upgrade and return the laptop and give it a second life. For example, I would be quite pissed if IT gave me a defaced laptop like this as a loaner while mine is getting repaired.
I don’t think it’s quite like that, I think it’s more that an important part of these drugs is the release mechanism - and any two given brands will work differently for a given person.
I take long release methylphenidate (Ritalin/Concerta being the most known brands). I started with Medikinet because that’s the main recommendation from my healthcare provider. It turned out it releases most of the dosage in the short term and at 40mg doses I constantly felt like I was at an airport with my boarding gate closing in seconds.
Moved to Meflynate, which is also methylphenidate hydrochloride, and now I’m a happy bunny.
My point being - it’s not that generics are bad necessarily, it’s more like, only a certain brand(s) will work for you. Whether for you that’s the more expensive or cheaper one, it’s a bit of a lottery really.


I have never seen “immense” spelled that way!
That must be Monster Hunter.
As a person with ADHD… I kid you not, it took me months to get through Monster Hunter’s World character creator, and by the time I managed, I had already lost interest in the game.
X and X-2 have so much time travel.
X: People die because they got sucked in by time travelling monster
X-2: Recovering time-travelling boyfriend by astral-projecting to sing the songs of a 100 year old pop-star who is also Yuna but… Time travel?
Edit: I would also accept the “alternate realities” interpretation from comments below, but I’d say travelling between alternate realities is covered under the general umbrella of “time travel”.
I profoundly dislike the philosophy of renting rather than owning your compute, but with the current price of components, I just can’t be bothered to buy a gaming PC. I have a steam deck and a £10 subscription to GeForce now, and with this I’m sorted for pretty much anything.
For the £120 that it costs me a year, I could barely buy a 16 GB RAM stick, let alone a 3060 RTX… It would cost me 10-15 years worth of the subscription to buy something equivalent and there’s no way anything with those specs is staying relevant any longer than 5.