

Well, I kinda had the impression peristalsis loads the cannon, so to speak, while pneumatics fire it.
Well, I kinda had the impression peristalsis loads the cannon, so to speak, while pneumatics fire it.
“Artist is guy who has unrealistic expectations of women’s bodies” Nope, this time, the artist is a bombshell who used her own body as a reference for drawing
Hell, they’ll look them straight in the eye with greasy lips smiling wide and sincerely say, “Thank you.”
I think the idea is one of them is convincing someone to not do something they still have the power to do, while the other would be taking that power away completely. There may be a truly foolproof way to disarm a weapon, but there will never be a foolproof way to convince someone of anything due to the unpredictability of people.
That’s my reading as well. I have no idea what is actually in Article IX but it sounds like UAE snuck in “except us” when it came to defining the ICJ’s jurisdiction. It’s giving SovCit vibes, only instead of a sovereign citizen unbeholden to their government and declaring their house a nation state, it’s a country unbeholden to the world and declaring themselves outside of its purview. And the ICJ is just shrugging their shoulders saying the same thing.
Imagine someone shooting up heroin while driving, getting pulled over on a highway on-ramp, then telling the cop who is looking at the needle in their arm that technically this is a highway, so highway patrol are the only ones who could pull them over. In what world does the cop shrug and say “Aw shucks, you’re right” before getting back in their squad car and driving off? Because it seems like the international equivalent of that just happened but with genocide instead of addiction.
We’re gonna need a bigger M&M’s tube…
Absolutely. Saved a copy for when it inevitably gets censored. This summation stuck out to me: