but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

But that’s the LAWYERS job /s

So there’s two "X"s, only one more before things get really interesting…

The nearest to me is super run down and gross with people doing drugs in the parking lot, and its 2.7km from me. Instead I end up going to a nice one in a different part of town just over 9km away. Obviously driving is the only option for either.

having free copies of the content available on the internet decreases the desire for people to obtain paid copies of the data.

According to who?

Nice, they intend to donate any financial gains from the lawsuit (assuming they win, and after covering their own court fees, I’m sure).

For me its more like that bit from Monty Python and the Holy Grail where the soldier seems miles away as he charges the castle, until a random moment where he’s right on top of them.

The startup claims that all use of AI for the military will be consistent with OpenAI usage guidelines, which are determined by OpenAI itself.

Translation: “I do what I want”

Oh man, how has ‘The Fall’ not been mentioned?!

It’s one of the most visually stunning movies I’ve ever seen, and the story will tear your heart out.

Someone has been watching too much Clarksons Farm, lol

Confused the shit out of me for a sec

REDACTED

I guess “undesirables” don’t count as part of the citizenry? You’re only reinforcing my point, that the government stripped firearms from the people they wanted to kill/oppress. If it wasn’t worth doing, nobody would have done it. Instead, Pol Pot, Hitler, Idi Amin, Stalin, Kim I’ll Sung, Mao, Mussolini, etc., have ALL taken away firearms in some way from their peoples.

Almost every tyrannical regime in the 20th century systematically disarmed their citizenry, leading to some of the greatest atrocities the world has ever seen. It’s not a coincidence.

Just to say something different then the definition, I would describe it as both a representation of, and the justification for, the government’s monopoly on violence.

#1 Making more humans #2 Making less humans

655321

Perhaps, but I’d guess the risk of assassination rises with influence as opposed to their own views on violence

To be fair, so was Malcolm X

Crazy flick

So it would resemble the beginning of the universe, but smaller. Neat.