Ardens

That there tells you, what the Israeli people are…

But Consent-O-Matic does not break websites (very rarely so), so it’s better than uBlock in that specific area.

uBlock Origin Firefox Multi-Account Contaniners (and then use them) If you use some kind of webmail like google, hotmail, yahoo, then: Webmail Ad Blocker Remove FBclid and UTM

Optional Dark Reader Enhancer for Youtube

If you have your own, why do you want to use theirs?

Buy your own domain name, rent a mail-hotel, and you have the full control. Set it up with IMAP, and enjoy it in Thunderbird.

Is it harming someone?

Who cares. Eat what you like. If it’s a pineapple burger, put it in… And let people eat what they want and like, as long as it is not harming others.

Nice propaganda, from those who wants people to stop using apps that they can’t control.

I agree on that part. Greed is a bad thing, and I don’t support that either.

For me, leaving is a statement, and a personal reason. I don’t see how it could not be both? I don’t know anyone who trusts them. But shifting the powerbalance towards privacy and ethics, will never be a bad thing.

I don’t disagree… but we must keep the pressure up. I know I’ve helped a little more than 10 people leave FB and Google (and most of Microsoft)… A couple of them have left Apple too… It’s a slow, but steady movement. :-)

That’s just about numbers. Most sites will adjust, if enough users are turning away to another site that are less intrusive.

Sadly, though this is totally insane, it is by far, not the most insane happening in the US, right now…

Being one yourself, that would make sense. You’d have a strange conversation.

So, where did I use name-calling?

An open discussion is always welcome. Someone hijacking a conversation is not. So yeah… your bad.

1. it’s not true. Default calls are encrypted.
2. I have not said anything about what I want for Telegram. Are you trying to make a straw man here? Not that you want to interject yourself into this debate - then tell me, what is the big problem with the serverside not being OS? I did write it would be optimal, but what is the big issue for you? Try to answer without making another straw man about something I didn’t say… ;-)
3. I don’t care about your trust issues. Go deal with them…

So far, don’t you think that you really would know, if government was involved in any way that didn’t involve crime fighting? Do you prefer an app, where crime roam free? Is that your issue? That it doesn’t?

AFAIK it’s you and two others, who don’t acknowledge my preferences… So please consider following your own advice!

First of all, you injected yourself in my debate with another person. You do it by answering for that person, which mean, you lie by default, since you don’t know that persons answers. Then you say there are no end-to-end encryption by default, but that depends on what you use it for. Calls are encrypted by default.

But nice to know that you really didn’t have any serious red flags. Now it would be nice to hear from the person I was originally debating with…

There’s end-to-end encryption. It’s fine that you can chose what needs to be private, and what doesn’t need to be.

There could be several reasons as to why the servers are not OS. Why do you need that part to be OS? Seriously, why?

Oh, so your problem with Telegram is, that it had some issues in the past, just like EVERY other app in the beginning? Nice one. :-)

So, let’s summarize.

1. You lie, and say that there’s no end-to-end encryption when there is.
2. It would be preferable to have OS servers, but it’s not a major issue, since everything else is.
3. You have an issue with something in “Back to the Future”… Which is no longer an issue.

You contradict yourself. You can’t say that the price is fair, for something that doesn’t have the features that the price should cover.

Feel free to list them - with evidence and not just prejudice…?