It’s literally a tactic used by children when they’re being reprimanded. If you ever come across an “adult” that argues that way, tell them to sit back while the adults talk.

Billions of taxpayer money gone to AT&T and Verizon? Sounds like their infrastructure should be seized and nationalized.

What does a robot vacuum have to do with a dancing exercise regimen?

Don’t put down African nations like we don’t have the CIA to keep things that way.

Those who want the benefit of the social contract without adhering to it will be dominant as they have an upperhand.

Will no one rid me of this judge?

Belt-and-suspendera approach? We’re barely using a drawstring to keep our pants up.

I feel like maybe poverty shouldn’t be escaped by perpetuating the bombing of children, no?

Personally, I go with “forced-birth.”

That’s why I said no concessions.

How about we make them not exist? No concessions with those who profit off of the sick as we distantle and restructure the healthcare system.

Well the SAG-AFTRA strike is over so she’s probably back to work, duh.

Let the greedy fend off for themselves in the desert and see how far it gets them.

The intolerant are not covered by the contract, so putting them down is fine.

I think it’s pretty simple: Are you actively trying to put one group down to further your own interests? If “yes”, then you’re wrong and should stop that.

10. Unless they poisoned the Nazi’s food and are just waiting to see the waterworks.

Life is cruel like that.

I’m going to say “I hope we don’t get off on the wrong foot” and then they’re going to ask me to leave.

They’re all just as entitled as this character was too.

So then those that tolerate the intolerance are also excluded from the contract, right?

Edit: this is a genuine question.