I’d like to be able to agree that nobody enjoys having their words twisted to suit others’ agendas.

What does this have to do with the topic of adding conjecture needlessly to conversations?

Mostly I’m frustrated here because I’m advocating for the victim.

No you aren’t.

Yeah, teenagers just up and die and end up in ovens all the time, nothing weird about that at all /s

Maybe there’s details that aren’t being shared, and I suppose you can’t really rule out an industrial accident, but HMMMMM

This is not “advocating for the victim”. This is non sense that adds absolutely nothing to the conversation.

The truth is we’ll never know what happened because none of us were there.

At least you finally understand what I have been saying.

I’ve left this discussion with the feeling that you’re calling me racist and am out here trying to cause distress for the family. It’s just so far off that mark that it goes beyond the pale.

Allow me to confirm your feelings.

I am calling you a racist and saying your actions cause distress to victims. Because you are and they do.

I hope your day gets better.

What makes you think it isn’t going good? Do you believe that some random with an ignorant opinion on a situation has the ability to destroy my whole day?

The ego on you is impressive. Unwarranted, but impressive.

You betcha. Exploitation is equal opportunity.

Sure, I guess I’m just deeply suspicious when a young minority dies while working at a Walmart and police rule out foul play without further comment

What made you feel the need to point out the victim being a minority, and telling the world how deeply suspicious you are because of that, in your original comment if ethnic background doesn’t matter to you?

Now who’s adding conjecture?

“Opinion or judgment based on inconclusive or incomplete evidence; guesswork.”

Not me. Especially when the whole sentence remains in context.

Cause of death seems pretty apparent coupled with the lack of evidence demonstrating foul play. Plenty to go on that leads to more reasonable conclusions outside of foul play.

Notice how I said the cause of death is apparent, and didn’t try to speculate on what it could be even though the most likely cause is asphyxiation from being stuck in an oven that has been turned on.

Facts are someone died in an oven, and there is no evidence of foul play. Your morbid need to know more than that while not being personally connected to the family is a sickness.

We’re obviously not going to agree on this

What exactly do you want me to agree with you on?

Sure, I guess I’m just deeply suspicious when a young minority dies while working at a Walmart and police rule out foul play without further comment

Would you be as suspicious if it was a white teenager? Or is this just a virtue signal?

At this point I haven’t even heard a cause of death. There’s nothing to go on except for conjecture

Cause of death seems pretty apparent coupled with the lack of evidence demonstrating foul play. Plenty to go on that leads to more reasonable conclusions outside of foul play.

Also I didn’t make anything up. I stated my suspicions and allowed that it could be even be accidental.

Yeah, teenagers just up and die and end up in ovens all the time, nothing weird about that at all /s

Maybe there’s details that aren’t being shared, and I suppose you can’t really rule out an industrial accident, but HMMMMM

You stated no suspicions. You pointed to the fact that all the details aren’t released, which is absolutely normal during investigations, and did your best Fox News impression of “just asking questions”.

But you have to admit it’s weird to discover someone in an oven. Even if it’s not foul play I want assurances that there’s an investigation being made to determine how this happened and prevent it from happening in the future

“We acknowledge the public’s interest in this case and that there are questions that may never have answers,” said Cromwell. “Please be mindful of the damage public speculation can cause. This woman’s loved ones are grieving.”

Chronically online ignoramus spotted.

It is better to wait for information than it is to make shit up yourself and call it productive.

How to add absolutely nothing but conjecture to a conversation 101.

Gambling regulation in all countries, regardless of legal status, to reduce exposure and availability of gambling, provide affordable and universal support and treatment for gambling harms, and to de-normalize gambling.

Looks like it is exactly a call to start regulating gambling to me.

Why is the Government responsible for regulating an adult activity beyond age restricting that activity?

How does one market something in a way that isn’t attractive to anyone between the ages of 0 and 17?

Neither alcohol nor tobacco are banned in Canada, and this is asking to put online gambling on the same level.

If this is asking for gambling to be on the same level as alcohol and tobacco, does that not imply gambling isn’t on the same regulatory level as the others?

Gambling is already regulated in Canada.

Capitalism simply gives people the dopamine they crave in whatever way they choose or are told they want to get it.

How exactly is the “Corrupt and incompetent government” responsible for people getting addicted to something?

The point is not to ban anything simply because people are, or can become, addicted to it.

What do Gambling, Social Media, Video Games, and Pornography all have in common?

They aren’t the problem, Dopamine is.

In order to use any service provided by Meta one has to already have their head in the sand and pants around their ankles.

Asking for mindfulness in the face of the latest “moral dilemma” posed by Meta is simply not something the user base seems capable of.

Pointing out inconsistencies, fallacies, and weaknesses ain’t a troll.

Pretty funny that you believe you did any of that. Not shocking that you default to the standard troll moves, pretty lazy if you ask me, but funny regardless.

You need to develop self restraint and recognize that your world view must hold up to scrutiny otherwise your belief is a lie if you don’t allow rebuke and correction.

As I stated, I am not here to debate your ignorant thoughts. You should probably take your own advice 9 day old troll.

What is the point of this? That it is easy to separate a fool from their money?

You asked a question, I answered it. Not here to debate your ignorant thoughts.