There will be exemptions for legitimate uses of nitrous oxide, for example in medical or catering industries. The gas is commonly used as a painkiller and for producing whipped cream in cooking.
So, according to the article, supplying Nitrous for recreational use is already illegal. If it is such a big problem, what is banning possession going to do other than ruin more lives? It is kind of wild that this is the solution they came up with given the history of drug prohibition worldwide and the fact that UK is one of the originators of harm reduction.
Sigh… making the same mistakes and expecting different results when plenty of research out there shows that treating poverty and depression does more to reduce drug use and other risky/antisocial behaviour than putting people in jail for it.
The article also mentions that the majority of people who use it are between 16 and 24 years old. Great way to end up with hardened criminals down the line.
Prohibition works! (for people who profit off the misery of others)
It’s alright though. All these can users are all white kids. Can’t believe this foreign owned government to start a drug war against a race that’s not not white
Now double banned for your safety.
I won’t miss seeing those cannisters littered around.
So why not make it legitimate with a deposit scheme?
And even better, also legalise drugs like weed which these are being used as a legal substitute for?
Absolutely, although I wouldn’t say NOS is substituted for weed all that much. Also, the legal limit for weed and driving should be raised, particularly since the government asked the scientific community where the level of impairment was and then set it lower.
I’m in favour of legalising drugs, but driving is dangerous and should only be done when you are sober and able to give your full attention.
Absolutely, however if the level of intoxication is below the level of impairment, then the drug is not having a negative effect on driving.
We have this discussion currently about Weed in Germany. Its so annoying to See articles with headlines Like “cannabis behind the wheel” etc. Noone ist advocating for people to Drive under the influence. But If i smoked a Joint on friday and get stopped on monday, i’ll lose my drivers license even though im sober. Drugs stay in your system way longer than the actual effect.
It’s a lot of effort to built up such a deposit system
It’s in no way unfeasible - and the deposits end up paying for the ongoing operation of the system.
Which is better, addressing the littering problem directly, or criminalising and litigating against a bunch of people with a law that can’t be enforced if they have a can of cream on them?
The deposit is just a deposit, it doesn’t pay for anything. Are you sure you understand how the deposit in this case works? You pay for something and you get that back when you return the item.
Maybe you should look into something like the Finnish bottle deposit scheme. It’s great but those take quite some time and effort to set up and get running properly.
Not everyone returns and collects the deposit back, these deposits end up funding the operations.
If the Finnish scheme is anything like the German scheme, that’s what I was thinking of. Although it doesn’t need to be quite so widespread with machines inside every supermarket.
They’ll have to wait with just taking the deposit money since for quite a long time you wouldn’t know if they’re returning it or not. And if it’s anything like other systems, you can return it to different place than the one you paid for, which requires moving money around and whatnot. And there’s the issue of getting them from the stores to be recycled and overall upkeep and governance of the system and so on.
The systems are a lot more complex than one might think at first.
I didn’t say it was simple, but it’s straightforward and very far from unfeasible.
@RaivoKulli @TWeaK if someone hands you 10 cans, they’ve handed you 10 cans. How don’t you know?
They don’t need tracking.(If a store hands you 100kg of cans, they’ve handed you 100kg. Audit would need you to weigh them and know their name, but little else.)
Won’t miss it because they’ll continue to be littered around?
So…
You’ll still be able to buy it “for whip cream”…
It’s just now cops will be able to arrest you for it if you have it now.
That’s not exactly a ban, and it’s not going to make it any harder to obtain.
So in other words it isn’t even necessarily something they can convict for. Strawberries and whipped cream at the park anyone?
You’re going to at least have to be seeing a mate that owns the equipment to use it for cream at the park. If you just stick it in a pot and let rip, you’re going to spray non-whipped cream everywhere, which I bet would mean a court wouldn’t consider it reasonable doubt.
They’re not hard to get nor expensive, and here are instructions to use it legitimately.
Does the UK not have a “beyond a reasonable doubt” requirement? How the hell are they going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt it was going to be misused unless they literally witnessed the act? As long as you don’t say anything, you could have purchased it for anyone or anything.
You’re applying brains and logic to a situation where they were never deployed.
There’s a fairly high chance that this law will never be enacted anyway. Given the current political situation we may have a new government by February 2024.
The doubt has to be reasonable, and it undermines your defence if you don’t answer questions. The prosecutor will ask you what you were going to do with the canister. If you decline to answer, you’ve not created reasonable doubt. If you say you were going to make whipped cream, there’ll be follow-up questions, like whether you had the equipment to do so. If you don’t, then it’s not reasonable to take your claims at face value, so there isn’t reasonable doubt.
Sounds like a new way to criminalize young people. Not from UK, can this be used to disenfranchise people?
Of course our government lives disenfranchising young people, they don’t vote conservative.
Unless you’re in prison or you were convicted of some kind of voter fraud, you can vote
You can vote but good luck finding a job or passing a background check lol
Thx
Cannabis is being legalised across America and in Germany. Meanwhile Tories are trying to expand the failed war on drugs
I hate Cruella Braverman.
“There will be exemptions for legitimate uses of nitrous oxide” Legitimate just means legal so this sentence is saying it will be legal to use it in a legal way… Pretty stupid
No, but it will be illegal to use it illegally.
I feel like it’s actually kind of already an illicit substance and therefore illegal.
So at this point they’re just making laws to make things that are already illegal more illegal but it doesn’t matter because none of them are enforced anyway.
You can go online and buy as much laughing gas as you want for your whipping cream needs. Sounds like they are banning that at the end of the year.
Will they even still be in power at the end of the year? I think they’re just saying this for the sake of saying something.
They will because they don’t have to call an election until next year, and god knows they’ll try to cling on to power as long as possible
There’s a lot of pressure on Rishi Sunak right now to call an early election. Primarily because the back benches just automatically assume that there’s going to be more revelations coming (or equally possible they actually know something), and at this point they actually limiting damage by getting out of power early.
They are thinking about the election cycle after this one.
It is possible
Who’s laughing now?
So long patisserie chefs
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The government’s decision to make possession a crime goes against recommendations from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which advised against new laws to ban nitrous oxide.
Announcing the law change on Tuesday, Home Secretary Suella Braverman said people in the UK were “fed up with yobs abusing drugs in public spaces and leaving behind a disgraceful mess for others to clean up”.
The government’s crime and policing minister Chris Philp said: "There is no question that abusing laughing gas is dangerous to people’s health and it is paramount we take decisive action before the situation gets worse.
Prof David Nutt, from Imperial College London’s department of medicine, previously said there was around about one death per year in the UK from around one million nitrous oxide users.
Repeated hits of nitrogen dioxide can deplete body levels of an important vitamin called B12, which, in turn, can cause permanent nerve damage.
It can affect both the spinal cord and the nerves in arms and legs, causing loss of feeling, abnormal sensations and muscle weakness or even full paralysis.
The original article contains 917 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Protip: you can buy NO2 really cheap on Amazon.
I use it for my nitro cold brew. Am I gonna have to break laws just to continue drinking my own nitro cold brew?
Don’t you want N2? Nitrogen? Not N2O (nitrous oxide)?
You can use both. All depends on what kind of texture you like if I’m not mistaken.
Hmm what I read there is a bit of a diff. Pity because the N2 chargers are quite expensive.
Let me try the N20, cos I’ve got a lot and they’re much cheaper.
I need Nos. One of these big ones. Actually, make that 2. And Harry, I need it by tonight.
What gas will they use in the foamer?
It says they’ll make exceptions for legitimate uses, I assume that includes making whipped cream. It’ll probably just be much harder to legally get your hands on it unless you run a catering company or restaurant.
CO2 would cause the cream to sour as a result of it’s acidity, and plain nitrogen isn’t soluble enough, so it’s probably not very easily replaced.
Having served time in the cuisine mines, it’s not.
It’ll be interesting to see how they gate access. Can’t send the dishwasher out to get more in the middle of a rush, hes 17. Can’t send the line, shes got charges. Can’t send the server, they’re legally drunk.
My wild guess is that they will not regulate access that much except prosecuting people that misuse it.
Feels unlikely that those whipped cream things will be completely useless or private individuals. But you never know.
Footballers are going to hate this. It’s an easy way to get high (for fun, not for performance) without being busted on a drug test.
Yeah, that’s why it’s being banned…
Hahaha. But yeah it’s not being banned because of that obviously. Just thought it would be interesting to add.
Well it’s not necessarily targeting specifically footballers but it’s being banned because people are using it as a drug. Why did you think they were banning it? For the lulz?
