return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agoJoe Biden Tees Off On Trump With A Most Backhanded 'Congratulations'www.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1172arrow-down119cross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkJoe Biden Tees Off On Trump With A Most Backhanded 'Congratulations'www.huffpost.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square62fedilinkcross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
minus-squareNudding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down9·9 months agoJust that a neoliberal will excuse literal genocide if it’s their guy being paid to do it.
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·9 months agoBut the numbers don’t add up. He’s probably being paid more money from people that want him to stop. I’m saying the money doesn’t seem to have any influence one way or the other.
minus-squareNudding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·9 months agoWell I brought receipts and you brought assumptions. Looks a lot like bribery from here. Also who the fuck are you? only $150,000 a year for 30 years??
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·edit-29 months agowhat receipts? You posted a number and no proof. I literally just did math on your comment. and 150K is one fifth of one percent (0.02%) of what the DNC raised the last quarter of 2023. If you’re trying to prove money==influence, you’ve successfully argued that no one is buying much of any influence with DNC for $150K a year. I’m not even arguing for or against your point, I’m just trying to point out that you’re providing evidence against the point you’re trying to make.
minus-squareNudding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·9 months agoMy bad. I got some threads mixed up.
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·9 months agoYeah, again, that’s a drop on the bucket over 30 years. It works as evidence against your point.
minus-squareNudding@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·9 months agoI absolutely couldn’t disagree more.
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoJust trying to help you with your quest ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Just that a neoliberal will excuse literal genocide if it’s their guy being paid to do it.
But the numbers don’t add up. He’s probably being paid more money from people that want him to stop. I’m saying the money doesn’t seem to have any influence one way or the other.
Well I brought receipts and you brought assumptions. Looks a lot like bribery from here.
Also who the fuck are you? only $150,000 a year for 30 years??
what receipts? You posted a number and no proof. I literally just did math on your comment.
and 150K is one fifth of one percent (0.02%) of what the DNC raised the last quarter of 2023.
If you’re trying to prove money==influence, you’ve successfully argued that no one is buying much of any influence with DNC for $150K a year.
I’m not even arguing for or against your point, I’m just trying to point out that you’re providing evidence against the point you’re trying to make.
My bad. I got some threads mixed up.
Yeah, again, that’s a drop on the bucket over 30 years. It works as evidence against your point.
I absolutely couldn’t disagree more.
Just trying to help you with your quest
¯\_(ツ)_/¯