• Erika3sis [she/her, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Votes for “keep” far outnumber votes for “delete”. The discussion is mainly about whether to keep the article as-is or to rename it to something like “Yaroslav Hunka affair”, which would include a biography.

    Of all the things you can criticize Wikipedia for, this honestly just isn’t one of them.

    • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I just looked and you’re right.

      But to be fair here all of what you mention is obfuscated away behind another discussion page and their own “policy” which no normal person would ever know or even care about.

      They could make it far more transparent to the visitor and most of these things could be included in that header.