foss

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re absolutely right. Fish isn’t really for scripting but is great for purely interactive use.

    Nushell however offers a totally different approach to “scripting” and I can achieve far more in a nushell one-liner than I ever could in a POSIX shell as it’s far more comparable to Python Pandas than a shell.

    For instance I can plot a line chart of file modifications over time directly in the shell with a single line of nushell. It’s mind blowing.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s great. I’m glad you like it and it sounds pretty awesome. It adds more variety to the command line, which is a beautiful thing. However, I do too much with remote systems that I don’t “own”, however, so, POSIX, for me, is a hard requirement - adding another domain specific language that I can only sometimes use is not worth the cognitive load for me.

      • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s totally understandable. And I’ll admit, I’m still writing a fair few #!/bin/sh headed scripts as I to work on too POSIX systems. I think we’re a long long way off of the POSIX standard being superseded by something else.