The mayor’s office says it would be the first major U.S. city to enact such a plan.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since the pandemic I’ve been working from home and that gives me time to take food-shopping off of my wife’s share of the household work. I noticed pretty quickly that every supermarket under the Kroger group was gouging on prices, so when they acquired Safeway I discovered there’s a WinCo in my town. (WinCo is employee owned, has the feel of a warehouse/bulk store, and it beats Kroger/Walmart/Amazon/GoodFoodHoldings stores on price, by a lot. Plus, the employees don’t have the energy of beaten animals and that matters to me for some reason.)

    Good on Chicago doing this but there are already alternatives to Walmart and Whole Foods in some places if you look.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      WinCo is legit. The bulk section alone makes going in there worth it. Need oregano? You can pay $5.99 for the jar at Kroger (in my area, Fred Meyer) or you can go to the bulk section of WinCo and pay $0.37.*

      * Numbers not exact, but it is literally that drastic a difference.

      • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        you can go to the bulk section

        Yeah. I got a bunch of resealable/airtight bulk containers and will probably never buy spices in those little 2oz shaker-jars again. My pantry is a small store by itself now, it feels better to get like a pound of a spice for $7 than it does to buy 2 ounces at a time for $7- and all those trips I don’t have to make to get a spice I just ran out of is totally worth it- my restocking trip is… from kitchen to pantry, takes seconds.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironically, way back in the 70s Kroger successfully defeated a hostile corporate takeover, in part by issuing their employees stock

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, where I live the employee-owned grocery store is of lower quality and higher priced than Walmart.

      I went in expecting more, was sorely disappointed and left without buying anything.

      It’s essentially the same products in a worse store for a higher price.

      I know a lot of people like to beat the ‘employee-owned’ drum, but unless that translates to lower prices or better quality, I don’t see a reason for customers to subscribe to it.

      • twopi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree. At the end of the day it’s a business. But if two companies offer similar products go with the employee owned company.

        The main thing about is decision making structure. Because employee or community owned stores are owned by the users. It means the end users have power over what is offered. As opposed to big box in which case it is non local non user shareholders.

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But if two companies offer similar products go with the employee owned company.

          Completely ignored my point about lower quality and higher prices.

          It means the end users have power over what is offered.

          What do you mean? The employees or the customers? I don’t really care if the employees have the power. That just moves who’s trying to take advantage of me.

          As opposed to big box in which case it is non local non user shareholders.

          It also doesn’t matter if they’re local.

          What matters is if they give me a better deal. If they can’t do that, I will go with someone who will.

          • twopi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I almost completely agree with your first and last points. I was trying to say if they provide the same product at the same quality and price try to prefer the co-operative. I say similar because, personally I’d give some leeway to the co-op. But there are limits and co-ops are businesses and if they give sub par products and services than we shouldn’t buy from them.

            The power is held by the owners. If it’s a consumer co-operative it is controlled by the consumer and a worker cooperative is owned by the workers. So the end users of products or the ones who have jobs. It depends on how it’s structured.

            I somewhat agree with your last point. The big thing is ownership is wealth and control. If you control your store you get to chose the available options if someone else owns it it means someone else has control. So I’d rather I have control over it. Again with the previous thing. If someone else can do it sooo much better than I than I should someone’s product.

            But we have to be careful because you can lead to the problem with data and big tech. I use an alternative to Google Cloud that is a cooperative but I have to pay. But with Google I don’t pay but loose my privacy. In that instance you have to determine what’s more important, given what I need it for is comparable to what I need what is important and I chose ownership and privacy over having neither of those.