• t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    If Israel wanted to ethnically cleanse they could have been more efficient

    This argument keeps getting thrown around, as though doing "only some" ethnic cleansing is not still ethnic cleansing or something. China could also exterminate all Uyghurs in Xinjiang at once if they wanted, but that doesn’t make their genocide of Uyghurs any less of a genocide either. Israeli government officials have said in plain terms that they think Palestinians should be moved to the Sinai desert or that other nations should let them take refuge (from Israel) in their states. That is literally advocating ethnic cleansing.

    • sqgl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Oct 7 was also “some ethnic cleansing”. Hamas didn’t even pretend otherwise.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sure. But what’s your point? Are you saying that makes it more okay for Israel to do it to Palestinians? Otherwise, it just seems like ‘whataboutism’.

    • sqgl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Sinai option is recent. At this point in time semantics don’t matter. I agree it is ethnic cleansing now. This is what you get when two right wing groups fight.

      The excuse of stopping another Oct 7 is weak. A competent government would not have let it happen in the first place. Preventing a repeat would not be difficult. Eliminating Hamas is fantasy as is eliminating the state of Israel.

      It would help if the global Left would drop the inflammatory “river to the sea” mantra and instead concentrate on a 2SS.