PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down12
arrow-up148arrow-down1imageMilitaries ARE capable of learning, right...?lemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to NonCredibleDefense@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 months agoYou’ll use rifled MBT main guns and you’ll like it.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 months agoTo be fair here, they really did it because they liked it. “It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
minus-squareSSTF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 month agoI always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change. They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.
You’ll use rifled MBT main guns and you’ll like it.
To be fair here, they really did it because they liked it.
“It” being the funny sounds of projectiles getting squashed against armor.
I always figured the doctrine and procurement created mutual inertia against change.
They like it because they have it, and they have it because they like it.