• green_copper@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yea, it is sad to see that many of crypto-coin project are handled as trading assets and not as what it started with: open currency. I would love to see more stability so that cryptocurrencies can be used for buying stuff more easily.

    otherwise there wouldn’t have been a cap on the number of Bitcoins that can exist

    there are other reasons for this: an uncapped coin is inflationary, so it can loose its value given enough time, no matter what happens to the economy around it. But then again, many projects without a cap try to set the emission-rate so that it somewhat balances creation with burn (for example by lost wallets or transactions to invalid addresses).

    • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I really prefer that second option to cause deflation because it allows currencies to be only slightly deflationary, but not too much like bitcoin which has just turned into an investment