The home secretary backed police and ordered a review of armed units after officers protested over a murder charge
Background on this for non-UK people -
-
Black guy shot by armed policeman whilst sitting in his own car.
-
Policeman arrested for murder, released on bail.
-
Last weekend armed police ‘strike’ by dropping their weapons because one of their own has been charged with murder
As per usual the victim is being forgotten in all of this while it turns into a massively corrupt political game.
I don’t know how things work in the UK, but most of the Kaba killing feels familiar — the cops’ highhandedness and entitlement, and the threat to stop doing their job (which most folks find terrifying, but sounds sweet to me), and the obedience of politicians like your Home Sec Braverman.
Only some small sliver of UK cops carry guns, so they’re probably seen (especial by themselves) as super-elite cops.
Can I ask about “NX121” though? Does every Brit get such anonymity when charged with crimes, and get released on bail when the crime is murder — or are such courtesies only for police?
Can I ask about “NX121” though? Does every Brit get such anonymity when charged with crimes, and get released on bail when the crime is murder — or are such courtesies only for police?
Depends on the circumstances with the anonymity. I’m not a lawyer but the ‘bail for cold blooded murder’ sounds very much like a cop privilege thing. If it was someone else they’d be too busy beating him up in the cells to offer him bail.
They definitely see themselves as special because Daddy lets them play with guns. One of my friends dad’s at school was a PC and told us he steered cleared of guys like that because they weren’t interested in crime fighting they were interested in playing with toys and getting people to call them ‘Sir’.
Thanks.
Next question: The Home Secretary’s duties include overseeing all law enforcement in England — is that correct?
If so, this is particularly heinous. She’s tweeting support for a cop charged with murder, peeing in the pool of public opinion.
Yep. That is correct, the Home Secretary is in charge of Police. This specific one we have now is a particular control freak. She was forced to resign from the same position in the last government for sending official documents from her personal Gmail.
For more on her racist, right-wing views, her current solution to immigrants making their way to the UK on small boats is to… ship them off to Rwanda. Since she’s not allowed to do that, Plan B keeping them on a huge barge, which is costing the tax on payer more than the hotels they were housed in before.
She’s big on culture war stuff (‘Police should be spending less time dancing with trans people at carnivals and more time fighting crime’, that sort of stuff). She’s seen as being the strongest contender for being a ‘Right’ leader of the party (as opposed to a centre)
Anyway, yes, this is the woman who is now in charge of this situation…
Wikipedia says “member of the Conservative Party,” so I suspected as much.
Thanks for the explanations.
If you’re feeling chatty sometime, I’d be curious to know your perspective on The Met’s ‘ordinary’ cops — the ones who patrol without guns. Maybe being gunless makes it at least hypothetically possible that they’re not all bastards?
I know I’m wild late to the party, but I’m interested in this topic too. I have siblings in the UK and their experiences with law enforcement have been pretty minimal/less aggressive compared to mine. Any chance of starting a Matrix chat or something for this
instancecommunity?I’ve never used matrix but sure!
If you want to make a Matrix, by golly make a Matrix and make it marvelous. I won’t be involved but I’ll root for you. :)
Me, I’m an old fart and a Luddite, on the internet only because I saw the usefulness of it. Haven’t seen usefulness in anything since, though — no smart phone, no smart watch, no smart house, no Roomba™, and I still read books on paper. No Matrix for me, thanks.
deleted by creator
If you’re feeling chatty sometime, I’d be curious to know your perspective on The Met’s ‘ordinary’ cops — the ones who patrol without guns. Maybe being gunless makes it at least hypothetically possible that they’re not all bastards?
I don’t think guns come into the equation. Police in the UK don’t patrol with guns, they’re only used for special operations. It just means that any violence tends to be more physical and less fatal.
I think that the majority of individuals who join the police force are decent people who want to uphold the law. However, the culture is still one that closes ranks when outsiders criticise, has a boy’s club mentality with some (sexist jokes, racist jokes, probably descends into more than jokes) which we’ve seen from leaked WhatsApp chats. It’s this culture which can and does poison minds and that’s where the ‘being bastards’ can come from.
Now I wasn’t there, and I suspect OP wasn’t either, but the narrative that he was sitting in his own car is disputed (as far as I know) and he may in fact have been using said car to try and ram police vehicles and officer who were operating a blockade to stop him.
Armed response are few and far between so aren’t deployed lightly. If they were there it was at least under the pretext that the subject may pose a threat to life.
Again, I wasn’t there and may be the cover story. But given the current climate around police shooting I would be surprised if the shot was a decision that was taken lightly.
I mean yeah, I wasn’t there. I’m sure there’s a lot going on with this we don’t know about as well but the narrative that certainly seems most likely from the way it’s been handled is that ‘cock up was made’. Maybe the unnamed gunman is the fall guy. Or maybe he was trigger happy.
Either way this is being sent upstairs so far it’s now being handled by the government’s press office to all intents and purposes. Which to me speaks volumes.
We’re working with no facts, but if they have facts that make it look less like they just shot the guy why the prosecution for murder. Not manslaughter?
