• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good, tourism is way too cheap for the environmental impact, the less people travel the better for the environment.

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is somewhat true but what this also causes is that poorer people have a harder time travelling and visiting other countries while rich people are unnaffected

      • Mkengine@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The common good and environment of a nation has priority over cheap tourism, so I don’t necessarily see that as a problem. Especially when the number of annual tourists exceeds the population by a factor of five in the case of Iceland, I can understand why some residents would like to reduce it.

            • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m sure the entire government of Iceland, including any departments dedicated specifically to, and with decades of experience in tourism, could figure it out if they really wanted. But just charging a tax is easier, so here we are.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Considering the climate crisis we’re facing I don’t care, anything to reduce air travel. All countries should turn non-local private jets around too.