• atkion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This internet version of centrism that everyone hates on is bizarre to me, for the reasons you say - the “only commit half a genocide” type of centrism. Are there people who really strike a middle ground on every issue on principle?

    I always understood centrism as “I hold enough opinions from both parties that I don’t align with either one”, which honestly fits me pretty well. I still have strong opinions on individual issues though…

    • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s typically how it’s actually used, but then that makes any reference to being a centrist pointless when discussing issues.

      This interpretation means there is no “centrist position”, so if an issue is divided by Democrat vs Rebuplican (which it usually is) then you’re picking a side for that discussion.

      That means that in issue specific conversations or debate, bringing up the fact your centrist only serves to fracture yourself from the party your currently on the side of. (None of this applies for registering to vote, where being an Independent actually matters).

      I just think the label at best fractures your impact and reach and at worst is an attempt to sound rationally superior.

      All this to say, not identifying with a party or choosing opinions are all well and fine, but categorising yourself as a centrist just groups you with a bunch of people that don’t necessarily represent or agree with you.