• Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah, you can’t just call up Israel, threaten US aid, and tell them to end hostilities: that only worked when Reagan and did it! And when HW Bush did it! /s

    I dont understand this idea that the US has no leverage when we are sending Israel billions of dollars. Without US resupply, several crucial Israeli military systems would be forced to shut down.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So, we’ve already given them all the means and any call for action is “shutting down crucial military systems” aka leaving them vulnerable in a hostile region?

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        “If you dont stop the genocide then we will stop arming your soldiers” sounds reasonable to me.

        If Israel is left vulnerable in a hostile region, it will be because of their own actions.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            And not all Gazans are Hamas, but the death toll is over 30k and people are starting to starve to death.

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I dont know what you mean by “what’s coming to them”. Right now it seems like there are no consequences for their actions, so nothing is coming to them.

                I believe Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir, Smotrich, and other military leaders have committed grave war crimes. They should be tried in international court and given a life sentence.

                I also believe the Israeli state owes a gigantic financial debt for the destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure. Israel has systemically destroyed water treatment, electricity production, schools, hospitals, residential buildings, etc. and they should rebuild it all.

                But I do not believe violence is part of the answer. We need permanent ceasefire, we need truth and reconciliation, we need justice. Any post-ceasefire violence is unacceptable, whether it be against Israelis or Palestinians.

                • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  But I do not believe violence is part of the answer. We need permanent ceasefire, we need truth and reconciliation, we need justice. Any post-ceasefire violence is unacceptable, whether it be against Israelis or Palestinians.

                  Just checking, what is Joe Biden’s role in all this?

                  • Krono@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I think Joe Bidens role should be in the cell next to Netanyahu.

                    But more realistically, I think Biden should step out of the way and let the international courts do their job.

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Did German citizens in the 1940s deserve what was coming to them?

                Perhaps not, or at least certainly not all of them. And yet Hitler was lawfully elected, which means many of them voted for him. Netanyahu and Likud were also lawfully elected.

                The question is, what responsibility do voters in a democracy hold for the actions of their democratically elected government? If fair and lawful elections are held, and the voters elect a government that enacts genocide, are those voters liable? Historically the answer to that question has been no. But is that the correct answer? If so, then should American Trump voters also be held liable for his national crimes? What about voters for George W. Bush?

                Perhaps greater responsibility would cause the world’s voters to be more selective in whom they support.

                • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t know man, the situation in Isreal is part of the fallout of hitlers actions. Seems like that should factor in. The mistake people are making is that there is only an illusion of choice and a vote for a president actually factors in very little in the grand scheme. A president does have some limited power but they are enabled by their party. If we look at the parties who’ve done the most damage I would tip the scale one way, every time.

                  To answer your question should people be responsible for the illusion of choice of a president? Fuck no.

                  Should they use their vote to resist the spread of white supremecy and authoritianism, yes.

                  • beardown@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Should they use their vote to resist the spread of white supremecy and authoritianism, yes.

                    Then Israel needs to be opposed, as do all ethnostates and genocidal regimes

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        So you don’t care about signing death warrants you just want to be upset about things in the middle east?