I’m repeating myself here but I hate it when people say “Just use X. It’s better.” and then omit explaining why it’s better. Give us a reason to consider changing or say nothing at all
Fair enough. 7z offers basically the same functionality as winRar including windows shell extensions (right click -> extract here, etc). It has slightly better compression ratios than WinRAR, and it’s open source. It doesn’t nag you to register.
It also supports an insane number of file formats. It will extract files from every pretty much every obscure archive you can think of (.ace, .cab) and all kinds of file types you wouldn’t expect like self-extracting executables, isos, .msi installers, vmdks, and more.
Might want to revise your joke then because unarch is a paid compression tool so adding pro to it doesn’t change much if that’s what you were going for.
Just use 7zip. It’s so much better.
I’m repeating myself here but I hate it when people say “Just use X. It’s better.” and then omit explaining why it’s better. Give us a reason to consider changing or say nothing at all
Fair enough. 7z offers basically the same functionality as winRar including windows shell extensions (right click -> extract here, etc). It has slightly better compression ratios than WinRAR, and it’s open source. It doesn’t nag you to register.
It also supports an insane number of file formats. It will extract files from every pretty much every obscure archive you can think of (.ace, .cab) and all kinds of file types you wouldn’t expect like self-extracting executables, isos, .msi installers, vmdks, and more.
Sounds cool. I’m still just using the unzipper that’s built in windows explorer. I don’t see why it’s inadequate.
Because it’s better lol
deleted by creator
Why would I pay for something someone else offers for free?
lmao it doesn’t exist
Might want to revise your joke then because unarch is a paid compression tool so adding pro to it doesn’t change much if that’s what you were going for.
huh ok my mad