• III@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know, the mere fact that each action was followed by a slide detailing that previous action should be more than enough to show effort. Even if it wasn’t received as funny, it is still provable as an attempt.

    I feel if he is brought to explain himself, it explains itself. It is just down to whether anyone can identify actual creativity in his school. Odds aren’t in his favor.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      The point is to get more comfortable talking in front of a crowd, and learning to present your ideas.

      This accomplishes none of that.

      • amio@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Definitely not when met with this sort of reaction. It easily could have.

      • McFarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I dunno, this kind of meta commentary could easily accomplish both, if executed well. Shows that you’re thinking of things in terms of overall social norms and trends, and figuring out how to present that idea in front of a crowd in an approachable way. I still think that the delivery is the most important aspect of this idea, though, as a piece of comedic satire.