Screenshot_20230907-124802_Eternity_1_1

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are technically correct except google is adsense … the ad market place.

    So technically they are not correct, and factually they are not correct, an effectively they are not correct. Sounds like they are wrong

    • Gamey@feddit.rocksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quaks like a duck it might just be a duck!

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d argue some magazines are basically ad pushers wrapped around a thin layer of minimum effort articles.

    Hell, most of them, when I think about it.

    Google, though… ads are their core business.

  • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nah I’d have to disagree in that statement entirely. TV Stations are ad companies. It isn’t shows with commercials every now and then, it’s the other way around.

    And have you read a Magazine in the last 30 years? They’re entirely ads, including sponsored content.

    • Gamey@feddit.rocksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That change only nerfed Adblockers and made Firefox the better supported platform for UBlock Origin but I think they talk about web environment integrety aka DRM for the web, that will break ad blockers enfirely for all sites that want to block them!