Software's free version was a good fit for tinkerers and hobbyists.

Since Broadcom’s $61 billion acquisition of VMware closed in November 2023, Broadcom has been charging ahead with major changes to the company’s personnel and products. In December, Broadcom began laying off thousands of employees and stopped selling perpetually licensed versions of VMware products, pushing its customers toward more stable and lucrative software subscriptions instead. In January, it ended its partner programs, potentially disrupting sales and service for many users of its products.

This week, Broadcom is making a change that is smaller in scale but possibly more relevant for home users of its products: The free version of VMware’s vSphere Hypervisor, also known as ESXi, is being discontinued.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        50·
        9 months ago

        There are a variety of options available with near feature parity. Killing the free version effectively cut out lab users which may as well say: we sure would like people to start training on a new platform. People use what they are comfortable with… and tend to carry a hatchet for companies that burn them.

        This was a short sighted play which ultimately will result in the platform dying slowly as the workforce changes. They cut off new blood: less people will be proficient with their platform and more will be pushing for a switch to the competition. In addition to the loss of the free version they massively ramped prices. They won’t last. Right now the companies that are too big to pivot are already starting to weigh the costs of transitioning vs the squeeze. The C-suite are idiots.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.worldEnglish
        121·
        9 months ago

        With infrastructure as code, vm management has become even more easy. A lot of companies are standardizing their vm park based on new deployment and management techniques e Sometimes in IaaS platforms (a fancy name for externally managed, rented hardware) but the VM has a long life ahead.

      • ɐɥO@lemmy.ohaa.xyzEnglish
        17·
        9 months ago

        Nope. I’m pretty happy with proxmox and I dont want to change a perfectly fine, running system

        • methodicalaspect@midwest.socialEnglish
          6·
          9 months ago

          +1 … been using PVE in my homelab for ages and just deployed a small, self-contained (i.e. non-SAN-connected) PVE cluster at the office in light of Broadcom’s shenanigans. I had no idea just how fantastically well Proxmox ran on higher-end hardware with Ceph installed. It’s glorious.

            • lud@lemm.eeEnglish
              12·
              9 months ago

              Proxmox doesn’t have a free tier, it is free.

              You can pay for support and shit if you want.

              Since you are apparently on an anti-proxmox crusade. Have you tried that iscus thing in enterprise? Like a very large scale production deployment? Since I have never heard of it, I am curious if anyone dares to use it in enterprise when people are even scared of proxmox or anything not VMware or MAYBE hyperV

              • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
                26·
                9 months ago

                Since you are apparently on an anti-proxmox crusade. Have you tried that iscus thing in enterprise? Like a very large scale production deployment?

                Maybe if you read the comment I linked you’ll find that that’s precisely what we had with Proxmox and then migrated to LXD.

                I am curious if anyone dares to use it in enterprise when people are even scared of proxmox or anything not VMware or MAYBE hyperV

                I guess it depends on the kind of “enterprise” we’re talking about. If your “enterprise” is somewhat of a provider / ISP they should be okay with LXD. A lot of service providers are running some form of LXC/LXD right now with very good results.

                If by “enterprise” you mean your typical 400+ people company that does something not related to tech with an overworked and barely competent IT / infrastructure team, then the answer is: they won’t move out of vmware ever.

        • TCB13@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          9 months ago

          Oh yeah, zfs send ftw. I personally run most of stuff on BTRFS and I can say the same.

    • Archer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      Once you’ve throughly beaten your head against every little thing that’s not ready to go out of the box like ESX is, puzzled through cryptic VM errors and Ubuntu being broken on default VM settings, and then browsed the sometimes aggressively unhelpful forums, it’s great!

  • Nomecks@lemmy.caEnglish
    50·
    9 months ago

    You are either going all in with VMware or you’re dead to them. Full suite or nothing, take your pick.

    • Omgboom@lemmy.zipEnglish
      32·
      9 months ago

      The moment that broadcom bought them the writing was on the wall. Many people have already jumped ship.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.caEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        A lot of people can’t jump ship, at least not within a year or two.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
          5·
          9 months ago

          I’ve got a client who is currently a vmWare shop that (along with moving datacenters) is migrating to hyper-v when they rebuild.

          • Nomecks@lemmy.caEnglish
            2·
            9 months ago

            I hope you mean Azure Stack HCI, seeing how Hyper-V 2019 is the end of the line.

            • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2·
              9 months ago

              I do. we’ve already deployed it internally once, and will be deploying additional clusters over the coming year.

                • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  2·
                  9 months ago

                  It’s alright, but it really isn’t my favorite. We spun up the cluster using professional support services from our vendor and it was rocky af, and the built in dashboard reporting is worthless if you want to know what’s been provisioned instead of straight utilization. Alerting has been another struggle for us as well.

                  I’m sure it would work better when more integrated with azure, but for our 100% local workload it leaves a lot to be desired. But thankfully since it’s windows based and manageable with powershell I was able to write a custom report to surface the metrics my teams and management care about.

    • fluxion@lemmy.worldEnglish
      8·
      9 months ago

      Perhaps I’ll try it out for a while before making such a huge commitme… oh, i see…

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.eeEnglish
      62·
      9 months ago

      For the cost, SMB is going to walk away. There are millions of SMB’s.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.caEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        SMBs are not the target. Companies with a sizeable vSAN investment, huge amounts of VMware based automation and the fortune 1000 are. MSRP on the cheap license is going to be around $275/core, minimum 16 cores per socket.

          • signalsayge@lemm.eeEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            Probably not that deep. I’ve heard there are definitely discounts. That doesn’t count for much though when it still increases your cost 6x.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.eeEnglish
          11·
          9 months ago

          That’s simply short sighted.

          So they ignore the Fortune 1000+1 (the up-and-coming 1000). They also stop providing a learning/familiarity path.

          I’m already seeing SMBs looking at KVM, Proxmox, Xen, etc. When these young engineers/managers/architects grow and move to Enterprise, what are they going to recommend when VMware is $300/core?

          I’m all for (as in I push) recognizing the value of (even expensive) licensing when it reduces engineering costs and complexity, but that’s what I’d call a “metric shitload”.

          A mid-size business could easily justify transitioning to just about any other VM solution when faced with that kind of increase. One 16-core host is now $5k in licensing, practically doubling the cost - and that’s an annual cost for years - saddling “future IT” with that cost that can now no longer be invested elsewhere.

          Now imagine you have 10 such boxes.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    40·
    9 months ago

    LOL was about to implement esxi, on a rather beefy surplus server, to run all my students’ PCs on since win 11 won’t boot on their hardware from 24h2… Guess my students won’t get to use VMware and the purchase approval I just got for a few workstation pro licenses wasn’t needed.

    Proxmox for baremetal hypervisor, or? I’ve got a bunch of windows server licenses as well, I think some for hyper-v server as well. What would you implement?

    • habitualTartare@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      9 months ago

      I’m happy with proxmox in a non-production environment/homeLab. Stable and straightforward.

      Just found out from your comment that windows is shutting the door completely on CPUs that don’t support POPCNT. There’s config settings to install Windows 11 on legacy hardware (old CPU, tpm chips, etc) but who knows when they’ll pull the plug on that.

      • Tja@programming.devEnglish
        8·
        9 months ago

        Weird as it is, it’s not as radical as I thought:

        For Intel’s chips, it was added as part of SSE4.2 in the original first-generation Core architecture, codenamed Nehalem. In AMD’s processors, it’s included in SSE4a, first used in Phenom, Athlon, and Sempron CPUs based on the K10 architecture. These architectures date back to 2008 and 2007, respectively.

        Of course they probably could have avoided it, but a 15 year old PC is as close to ewaste as it gets. Even if you could run Linux on it, a modern smartwatch probably has more computing power, let alone a smartphone or raspberry pi. The main use could be as a space heater.

        • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
          4·
          9 months ago

          Yea there’s plenty of reasons to shit on MS, but dropping support for 15+ years old CPUs isn’t one of them lol

          If someone is being affected by this, then maybe it’s time for them to upgrade their shit lmao

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
      8·
      9 months ago

      Proxmox is really good, same with XCP-ng. You could also run something like Debian server and roll your own KVM based platform if you have the chops.

      Overall, lots of solid choices in the Open Source realm. I would avoid proprietary solutions, since that’s largely the reason the whole VMWare situation happened in the first place.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      6·
      9 months ago

      Here’s a really nice guide to XCP-NG vs Proxmox (Video creator’s preference is for XCP, so there’s an acknowledged bias there, but it’s still a solid rundown of the two).

      Personally, I just run straight KVM on Debian or Ubuntu servers, but that’s not for everyone. Web based management for KVM is still kind of rough. Cockpit is getting there, but it’s missing key features, and the web based graphical console absolutely sucks.

    • exu@feditown.comEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      I really like XCP-ng. Imo the interface is more understandable and polished than Proxmox. Similar to vSphere + vCenter, but more advanced options as well.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish
      43·
      9 months ago

      Hyper-V or nutanix community. those will be the dominant hypervisors in the near future. I can see nutanix really taking off soon if they cant reach some of the features that VMware had. Hyper-v is sort of stuck since their host OS layer sucks, but it’s also pretty cheap.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        They’ve “redone” hyper-v a bit with the Azure HCI stack, but yeah, the OS layer sucks. Even more so than normal windows server.

  • Swarfega@lemm.eeEnglish
    221·
    9 months ago

    I know internally Broadcom is screwing over VMware employees with new contracts. I’ve heard of staff pushing back three times so far to get contracts changed.

  • scops@reddthat.comEnglish
    171·
    9 months ago

    Well shit. ESXi was the best way to build a home lab when studying for the professional certifications I need.

      • fjordbasa@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        Proxmox is a good option for home labs (in my opinion) but it sucks if your workplace utilizes VMWare (or a product limited to VMWare) and you want practice at home

      • scops@reddthat.comEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        I haven’t worked with it before. The product is only supported on VMWare hypervisors, so no matter what, I’ll have to build on an unsupported setup, but I was leaning towards KVM for familiarity. I will make sure to check Proxmox out too though.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
      9·
      9 months ago

      Check out XCP-ng. Open source, enterprise grade bare metal hypervisor.

      I moved from ESXi to it about a year ago, it’s been solid. Lots of documentation and support from the community. Lawrence Systems has a ton of great videos on configuring it, both simple and advanced.

        • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
          1·
          9 months ago

          Large portions of IBM, Rackspace, Alibaba, Oracle, and AWS’s cloud infrastructure are powered by the Xen Project hypervisor, which is the core of the XCP-ng stack.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      And everyone saw that coming

      I wonder where all the “wE jUSt GoTTa WAiT aNd SEe” people are now?

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldBEnglish
    21·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:

    In December, Broadcom began laying off thousands of employees and stopped selling perpetually licensed versions of VMware products, pushing its customers toward more stable and lucrative software subscriptions instead.

    This week, Broadcom is making a change that is smaller in scale but possibly more relevant for home users of its products: The free version of VMware’s vSphere Hypervisor, also known as ESXi, is being discontinued.

    ESXi is what is known as a “bare-metal hypervisor,” lightweight software that runs directly on hardware without requiring a separate operating system layer in between.

    ESXi allows you to split a PC’s physical resources (CPUs and CPU cores, RAM, storage, networking components, and so on) among multiple virtual machines.

    ESXi also supports passthrough for PCI, SATA, and USB accessories, allowing guest operating systems direct access to components like graphics cards and hard drives.

    It was also a useful tool for people who used the enterprise versions of the vSphere Hypervisor but wanted to test the software or learn its ins and outs without dealing with paid licensing.

    The original article contains 334 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 49%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!