throwaway389430@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoNuclear fusion reaction releases almost twice the energy put inwww.newscientist.comexternal-linkmessage-square377fedilinkarrow-up1655arrow-down126cross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todayworldnews@lemmit.onlinephysics@mander.xyzsingularity@lemmit.online
arrow-up1629arrow-down1external-linkNuclear fusion reaction releases almost twice the energy put inwww.newscientist.comthrowaway389430@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square377fedilinkcross-posted to: futurology@futurology.todayworldnews@lemmit.onlinephysics@mander.xyzsingularity@lemmit.online
minus-squareFat Tony@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·9 months agoI thought because of the law of conservation of energy you couldn’t get more energy out of something you put in.
minus-squareel_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down3·9 months agoI’m getting troll vibes, but I’ll bite lol. Fusion reactions are the exception since you’re turning some mass into energy according to: E = mc^2 There’s many quality videos on YouTube that can provide a better explanation than I ever could.
minus-squarelogos@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·9 months agoYou can think of the material being fused as fuel. More energy is produced by burning the fuel than in the spark it took to ignite it.
minus-squareRogueBanana@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 months agoThat doesn’t include the change in mass tho
I thought because of the law of conservation of energy you couldn’t get more energy out of something you put in.
I’m getting troll vibes, but I’ll bite lol. Fusion reactions are the exception since you’re turning some mass into energy according to:
E = mc^2
There’s many quality videos on YouTube that can provide a better explanation than I ever could.
You can think of the material being fused as fuel. More energy is produced by burning the fuel than in the spark it took to ignite it.
That doesn’t include the change in mass tho