Krudler@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoIt seems like all packaged foods do this nowlemmy.worldimagemessage-square274fedilinkarrow-up1868arrow-down1128file-textcross-posted to: benjamingetthemusket@lemmy.cafe
arrow-up1740arrow-down1imageIt seems like all packaged foods do this nowlemmy.worldKrudler@lemmy.world to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square274fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: benjamingetthemusket@lemmy.cafe
minus-squarePlantObserver@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-210 months agoIf I’m reading table 2-9 right this package would be allowed to be under by 28.3g
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoYeah that seems to be how it reads. Weird that heavier packages are allowed a smaller tolerance ? Like a 198g package can be 28g under, but in the last row anything over 4.5kg needs to vary by less than 1%
If I’m reading table 2-9 right this package would be allowed to be under by 28.3g
Yeah that seems to be how it reads.
Weird that heavier packages are allowed a smaller tolerance ? Like a 198g package can be 28g under, but in the last row anything over 4.5kg needs to vary by less than 1%