• conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    262
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tbh, the worst part is when you pay for it and still get ads anyway. Feels like double dipping, but it’s obviously going to happen because wall street doesn’t like when line only goes up a little.

  • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pirate everything. Pirate streams, torrents, whatever.

    Pirate. Everything.

    *unless it’s an independent artist of some sort. then, just buy some merch from them or something.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      No I don’t. Gold was there pretty much from the get go. Without would be better, but what you asked I don’t recall existing.

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Only selected few games had that on PS2. Games were largely SP on top of that. It wasn’t default free, it was a fee except for few exceptions.

          Never owned PS3 so no comment on that.

          BUT, my original question is still applicable. The past you speak of wasn’t common and not something that’s agreed to be the “good old days” so to speak.

          Not saying what you peddle wouldn’t be great, it would, but your statement simply isn’t accurate.

  • Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brothers, sisters, others, it’s time we return to the old ways. To the high seas. We steal from those who own, but do not pay to own, the content they distribute. We will share this media amongst ourselves until they learn that we were willing to pay with dollars, but not with time.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like to bootleg the major studios and patreon the indie artists that are giving their shit away for free.

    • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Where do you stand on indie artists that are using Patreon to act like major studios, e.g. nothing is free and their work is limited release and deleted after the month?

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find it harder to be upset about what an artist does with their work because they’re the sole creator and didn’t exploit anyone to make it. The limited release stuff doesn’t sound great but none of the artists I follow do that, I certainly wouldn’t support them if they did. If they’re planning to never release the art ever again then I think there’s a fair argument to be made for piracy, although if you’re just waiting for the month to turn over to look at it guilt free, well, I think you’re just trying to justify it to yourself.

        • Ganbat@lemmy.fmhy.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve seen a few that delete their stuff after the month and never release it again. IIRC, at least one of them was making relatively huge cash per month and only ever released cropped previews publicly, so that one was definitely what I’d call predatory, but that is just the most extreme case I’ve seen. I hate that false scarcity works so well.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never seen an indie artist on Patreon that delete shit or used any kind of DRM. At least no artist that I’ve been inspired to support.

        I try to never steal from people, only corporations.

        • Ganbat@lemmyonline.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve seen a few different methods. Scrubbed Patreon profiles, archives with passwords that change every month and aren’t redistributed, etc. I’ve run into several artists who do this.

  • patachu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone is saying Piracy but I say Public LIbraries, which often have CDs/DVDs/BDs/games now (depending on your locale). They’re taxpayer funded, so you might as well get your money’s worth, and they keep track of how often stuff gets borrowed which determines future financial support.

    (And if you are tech-savvy enough to be on Lemmy, you probably know how to make a … permanent copy … for yourself to keep)

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      Libraries are great. Just think about it, if libraries as a concept hasn’t already exist, there is absolutely zero chance it will be invented in our time due to our overly restricting copyright law.

      • Heidur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        And also due to a rightward shift in the Overton window. A place where people just get to borrow books for free? That’s socialism. And it will completely kill the entire books industry

      • CosmoNova@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is exactly why big corporations are lobbying hard to get public library stripped of funds by any means necessary. I mean you can even 3D print spare parts in many libraries for free by now! The super rich cannot have that.

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or save the time and gas money and download it.

      I mean shit, I don’t even have a DVD burner in any of my computers. Haven’t for a decade and a half. You expect me to grab my external drive to burn a copy? I can download anything on my gigabit connection in 5 minutes.

  • iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t have Peacock but I’m hanging out at my parents house and apparently when you pay for Peacock you have to watch ads at the beginning and end of shows PLUS every time you pause.

    Every single time they paused it transitioned to an ad. What psychopaths run NBC?

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Concur. I pay for the following subscription services:

      • My internet connection.
      • My cell phone plan.

      That’s all. Everyone else can go fuck themselves. If I can’t buy it outright, I don’t need it. If it’s digital, it’s on the Pirate Bay. Prime is bullshit anyway. I don’t need a predatory gym membership; Putting an elliptical machine in my own house cost me all of $200 and it’s mine forever. I don’t pay for Dropbox or OneDrive or whatever; I have a massive hard drive in my PC and I can access remotely it via my VPN. Etc.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I would never pay them for their shitty little services. Imagine paying monthly for dropbox, sporify etc for years… That’s so much money.

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh Spotify gets a whole family unlimited for 17 euro, it’s pretty convenient compared to going finding and uploading to my device or purchasing individually.

    • terwn43lp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      people worship amazon then get mad when they make changes, a business is gonna business

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t hate subscription based services if they’re priced fairly and make sense.

    Paying monthly for a service that then starts giving you less, adds more premium plans, introduces ads, etc. is garbage.

    Paying for a game, then having to pay a monthly fee to play (WoW, for example), is garbage.

    Paying for software, but then having to pay monthly to use the software, is garbage.

    Paying for software, but then having to pay monthly to be allowed to contact support (Blue Iris), is garbage.

    But paying for things like Spotify, where you get access to pretty much all songs as they release, have no limit on how much you listen to, and it has a fair student pricing or family pricing, that’s fine. Way better than paying per song.

    I mean shit, if I paid for every song I have in my library on Spotify, I’d owe $1430. My Spotify is $17 per month, spit between 4 people, so I pay $4.25. I can either pay for every song in my library and not add any more, or pay for Spotify for 28 years and continue growing my library…

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      WoW and other MMOs are not just games with slapped on subscription costs. It is a very specific subtype of games which have much higher maintenance cost than an arena shooter. There is a reason these games get shutdown when certain financial thresholds get passed beyond let’s do something more profitable.

    • Zhao@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spotify is the only subscription I still pay for. That’s it. Everything else is whack

    • leviathan3k@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, this.

      The economics of the world are such that people need to be paid for the content they produce. Having a direct relationship between me as the consumer and them as the producer is the way we don’t get shit like all of the ad-based spyware that surrounds shit like Facebook. It won’t completely prevent it, but it gives a good business plan for it not to happen.

      I’d vastly prefer something that didn’t require some megacorp as evil as Amazon. But… this could actually make as much sense as is possible with our current economic system.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, fuck subscriptions. If I can’t buy it once and own it, then it’s a scam on consumers. Change my view.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did. Look at my Spotify example. It’s literally more expensive to own the songs than to pay for Spotify.

        Unless you only want like 30 songs.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still cheaper, though.

            I’d rather have access to pretty much every song on demand for $4 per month and not own it, than pay per song.

            I pay $4.25 per month for Spotify. That’s $51 per year. I have access to pretty much every song, or I could buy 39 songs to own instead.

            I save more than 39 songs per month. Financially it makes no sense to buy them. Especially if you consider I get bored of some songs, and never listen to them again.

            • ShadowCatEXE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              The way I look at it, is I don’t pay to listen to the music, I pay for the convenience.

              Most music I listen to is on YouTube, where if I wanted to, I could just download it and “own” the song for free. However, in the interest of saving time, letting Spotify create playlists based on what I listen to, I just pay a monthly fee. Not to mention that I can share my playlists on multiple devices, whereas if I download music, I can’t.

              I also have a family plan with all spots filled up, so that’s 6 people listening to all their music for $20/mo CAD. Far superior to buying an album or individual songs.

  • phario@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There was a prophetic podcast episode from the series Plain English a while back that I constantly think about.

    In that episode the author describes how the internet is going through a revolution.

    Basically 20 years ago, the internet was all about gaining numbers. Companies could operate at a loss if they got people signed up. Facebook, Google, YouTube, Uber, Deliveroo, etc. they were all about getting you in their mailing list or consumer list and who cares what happens then.

    Now there’s an issue because that model is not profitable. In order to continue, all the internet is moving towards subscription.

    In a sense, I don’t think of that as intrinsically bad. Patreon is a good example. The internet is now filled up with so much shit that people are willing to pay to filter it. So with Patreon, you pay a fee to support an artist to produce the content you want. That itself isn’t a bad idea.

    Now that being said, a lot of “bad things” do emerge. The fact that you can no longer buy software like Adobe and it’s all subscription based. That’s shit. But that also inspired software alternatives like Affinity Designer.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact that you can no longer buy software like Adobe and it’s all subscription based

      100% the biggest factor in me deciding to buy Magix Vegas (formerly Sony Vegas) video editing software was because they still sold lifetime codes. Have I gotten $400 worth of value out of it? Fuck no. But I can use it whenever I want for as long as I want without worrying about whether or not I can afford it for the month.

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The you have companies like Filmora who tried to turn lifetime licenses into subscription ones…

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ironically enough the only reason I bought Vegas in the first place was because of the changes to Wondershare

        • elscallr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much everything on there is monitored by the rights holders and anything that’s not is loaded with malware. L337 or torrent leech is what you want these days, for the mainstream stuff. TL requires invites but they’re easy enough to get and it’s got pretty much all the mainstream TV, movies, and software. If you want more niche stuff you’d want to look around a bit more, though.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure. If you want to torrent from a website that the US government uses as a honeypot.

            Or you can join 2023 and use a proper website. Also ditch that Malware called uTorrent and use qBittorrent.

          • TrueDahn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldn’t use a pirate streaming site over torrenting even if I was getting paid to do so lol the releases generally have terrible bitrates and low picture quality, likely because they’re the smallest files the site uploaders could find. They’re convenient if you can’t afford a VPN and don’t care about file quality when it comes to movies and shows, but I prefer being able to select a high quality file with good encoding, quality compression (265, AV1), and known high quality uploaders, like UTR and QxR. That’s only possible through torrenting the file or getting it through Usenet.

            • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nope

              Those Times where Warez-Streaming-Sites had low quality are long gone. While 4k=3840 releases are rare, we have mostly 1920 nowadays with some 1280 in-between, often Bluray- or Streaming-Rips without re-encoding, at least if the source was H264/H265. Older MPEG2/4 though is still often recoded. You can easily re-encode an old MPEG2-Bluray from 20Gig to H265 4Gig without visibly loss. With more modern Codecs the Data is usually “re-containered” which means the Content itself isn’t changed, only the Encryption and Container are changed.

              Overall Streamingz-Sites are pretty good nowadays, Amazon and Netflix take up to one minute to switch to high Bitrate quality for me. With Warez-Sites you have to wait 3-5 seconds but then it immediately starts at Max Quality and NEVER at lower quality. And their Search actually works great and is well organized and everything reacts so much faster because they reduce the eye candy. They also often have bookmarks - which don’t work as good as commercial providers but good enough.

              I can only have access to Amazon, Netflix, Joyn and Public Television Media Centres so for other providers your mileage may vary.

              • TrueDahn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Meh. I still prefer Stremio and my custom configured Jackett setup for searching for torrents. Just has more features and more control. I’ve never encountered a pirate streaming site with even half the features Stremio has. I will grant you that anime streaming sites have gotten a lot better over the years, but I still don’t trust general pirate streaming sites. It’s great to hear they got better though. Easier acess to media is always a good thing.

                • Crass Spektakel@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Torrents of all kinds can be easily tracked and its users be sued because they do not only consume but also distribute.

                  One-Click-Hosters and Streamingz-Sites on the other side are hard to track and their users don’t distribute.

                  At least by German Law it is mostly “we only care about distribution, not consumption”. The later has an estimated damage of $1 per case, that is not even petty crime. Distribution on the other hand often is handled at $1000/case… I think there was not a single case of a Streamingz-User being prosecuted but already millions of Torrent-Users.

  • finnie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    …but capitalism is so good, things only get better!!! The market is too regulated, is the problem

    • trailing9@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is very regulated. Remove copyright protections and things will change instantly.

  • finestnothing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only subscription service that I pay for is tidal for music (pays artists more than Spotify, same cost) and that’s only because maintaining a local library of music is too much of a pain for me right now. I may slowly build a local music library of only music I like, but I love listening to new artists so the $10 per month is worth the convenience.

    YouTube? Ublock origin
    Movie/tv streaming? Self hosted media library, plus some random services that are provided through my phone bill at no cost
    File storage? Stored with my movies and TV on some hdds in raid
    Amazon? Its not hard to find other retailers (or direct providers) with better prices and no subscription needed. Sometimes have to pay for shipping and it’s slower, but worth it

    • rororo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Passing along advice someone else posted on lemmy. If you have an android TV box, look at Stremio + Torrentio. Game changer!

    • leggettc18@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do go for YouTube premium but that’s my primary source of entertainment nowadays and it does result in more money in my favorite content creators’ pockets (apparently more than ad-based revenue according to some sources at least). Plus YouTube music is included in that and is actually quite good.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most music steaming services have garbage selection for dubstep anyways, so local library is the only way to go.

      I pity that iOS users don’t have a good option for downloading music off YouTube though.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve tried Tidal a couple of times and it never felt like it was hitting the mark. The HiFi is a solid feature though.

      • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah had the same feeling about tidal as well. Settled for Apple Music since they offer hifi and a nice interface. Spotify still has the best playlists but it’s getting feature bloat and the quality isn’t up to par

      • senoro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The best deal you will get is Apple Music. Especially if you are a classical music fan it is unbeatable. But another HiFi one that isn’t apple, is qobuz, although the song selection isn’t as wide as spotify or tidal or apple music. But they do pay artists a lot more and they have a webstore for purchasing FLAC and MP3s if that’s what you like.

      • finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t had any issues with it, the quality isn’t as good as self hosted flac files (unless you want to pay for the highest tier, I assume) but it’s at least as good as Spotify imo. Big selling point initially was Plex integration though

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you have at least 6tb of storage space and good internet, the RedTopia torrent is more than enough to fill out a personal music library. That + SoulSeek for whatever new stuff shows up in my feed is everything I could ever need. Streamed anywhere onto my phone through Plex or PlexAmp