This is an excellent article by Cathy Young, exposing some of the widespread misandry within feminism.

I don’t agree with every point she makes. I think the 1848 demonizing of men is way more serious and shouldn’t be so easily dismissed. But that doesn’t take away from her main point: feminism is full of misandry, and if they want to be taken seriously by men, they need to address that.

  • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That says more about you than about feminism…

    What does it say about me?

    toxic masculinity

    Exactly - there is masculinity and toxic masculinity. How don’t you get that simple distinction? They are not the same. Feminism is criticizing toxic masculinity not masculinity as a whole.

    I could link you some resources, but I’m not sure if you’re willing to read them and let them challenge your views.

    What exactly should I do with random raddit posts and a tedX talk? If you have arguments bring them here and let’s discuss.

    • a-man-from-earth@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does it say about me?

      That you appear to be blind to the demonization of men so rampant within feminism, either willfully or because you’re a victim of its propaganda machine.

      Exactly - there is masculinity and toxic masculinity.

      Does feminism ever talk about positive masculinity? That’s the problem: they habitually associate masculinity with toxicity. And the characteristics of a gender (what it means to be a man, or a woman) cannot be toxic.

      Instead they should be more careful with their terminology and use for example toxic gender expectations. But they don’t. And that’s telling for a movement that is so sensitive to gendered language.

      What exactly should I do with random raddit posts and a tedX talk? If you have arguments bring them here and let’s discuss.

      If you’re interested in getting familiar with our arguments and the evidence, then there are some sources. They are not “random”.

      And if you’re not interested, then I think we’re done here.