db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 months agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down167cross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
arrow-up131arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 months agomessage-square28linkfedilinkcross-posted to: politicalmemes@scribe.disroot.org
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down23·4 months agovoting is not harm reduction
minus-squarenaevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up28arrow-down1·4 months agoEh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down22·4 months agoit’s a fact, not dogma
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·4 months agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·4 months agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·4 months agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·4 months ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-24 months agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·4 months agoI find this sentence very funny
voting is not harm reduction
Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
I find this sentence very funny