- cross-posted to:
- aicopyright@lemm.ee
- cross-posted to:
- aicopyright@lemm.ee
The lawsuit filed in federal court in Los Angeles on Thursday asks that a judge order the podcast outlet, Dudesy, to immediately take down the audio special, “George Carlin: I’m Glad I’m Dead,” in which a synthesis of Carlin, who died in 2008, delivers commentary on current events.
Carlin’s daughter, Kelly Carlin, said in a statement that the work is “a poorly-executed facsimile cobbled together by unscrupulous individuals to capitalize on the extraordinary goodwill my father established with his adoring fanbase.”
The Carlin estate and its executor, Jerold Hamza, are named as plaintiffs in the suit, which alleges violations of Carlin’s right of publicity and copyright. The named defendants are Dudesy and podcast hosts Will Sasso and Chad Kultgen.
Did you try watching it? The first minute or so is nothing but disclaimers that this isn’t “really” Carlin, and the AI itself makes numerous jokes about its AI nature throughout the special. There’s no false credit going on here.
If the creators didn’t get permission to use Carlin’s name and image, they deserve to be sued.
They could just as easily have generated an image to use if they didn’t want to be taken to court. Instead they will have an expensive FAFO episode.
I don’t know what you mean by this.
AI can be used to generate images of people. So they could have generated an image, put a fake name - or no name at all - on it, and gone ahead with the “comic relief”.
Instead they co-opted Carlin’s name and face.
Ah. You haven’t actually watched the video in question, then. At no point did they ever use Carlin’s face.
Nobody should watch it, because AI is bad. /s?
If you’re going to complain about things that it did then it kind of behooves you to know whether it actually did them.
wrong. the man is dead. do you think i should be sued by the lincoln estate for wearing a tophat and counting my drinks by the score?
Maybe check on copyright and estate laws, so you can understand what’s being discussed here.
i understand.
if the law supports it, the law is wrong.
don’t be condescending.
Someone could snip out a joke and claim it was Carlin. Then the disclaimers are meaningless. This happens on the internet all the time.
Writing a comedy set (ai or not) and then having a Carlin bot read it out and then releasing it under his name is definitely crossing some major lines. I’m not sure what the legality of it is at this point, but if it is legal it shouldn’t be.
Then that someone has done something wrong.
I could dig up one of your old comments, snip out something from one of them out of context, and use it to defame someone. Should you be hauled off to court for having posted that comment? I haven’t even done it yet.