• nicholas_saunders@mastodon.social
    1·
    10 months ago

    @happymilk@mastodon.social @AndrewR1234@mas.to @palestine@a.gup.pe looking forward to this mathematical proof, but, until then, I’d direct your focus to the scope of context argued by South Africa. Surely you agree with the extent of that scope? Because it’s very inline with what Arafat argued to Bill Clinton.

    • Happy Milk@mastodon.social
      1·
      10 months ago

      @nicholas_saunders@mastodon.social According to Israel, there are 300 000 members of Hamas, less than 7% of all Gazans. If, supposedly, a residential building becomes a legitimate military target if there’s a combatant (and note that not everyone in Hamas is) below it, that means that no more than 7% can become legal targets. Note that these are a lot of "if"s, and that not all Hamas combatants are gone, despite the bombings. @palestine@a.gup.pe

      • nicholas_saunders@mastodon.social
        1·
        10 months ago

        @happymilk@mastodon.social @palestine@a.gup.pe falls completely short of your claims, and ignores the question which was asked of you. Just on my phone at the moment, so a quick reply.